Search for: "People v Grates" Results 181 - 200 of 621
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
The courts must be partners with their users, including those without representation, to help them solve the puzzle of legal processes, to enable them to meaningfully participate (to paraphrase the Supreme Court of Canada’s decision in Pintea v Johns). [read post]
15 Aug 2020, 5:00 pm
            The DOJ v. [read post]
15 Aug 2020, 4:57 am by SHG
So, in a way, I’m grateful to USA Today and Josh Salman for giving me the kick I needed. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 2:55 pm by Kit Walsh
In response to a petition signed by 114,000 people, the U.S. [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 5:00 am by Josh Blackman
I am grateful to Professor Steve Wasby who flagged this exchange. [read post]
25 Jul 2020, 3:44 pm by Andrew Koppelman
Smith for their insightful critiques of my book, Gay Rights v. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 7:29 am by Priscilla Smith
(Cross-posted from Human Rights at Home blog, here)I suppose we are meant to be grateful for the Court’s opinion recognizing that discrimination against gay, lesbian and trangender people is sex discrimination under Title VII, as Andrew Koppelman explained a generation ago and discusses in a July 10th post here. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
The recent case of Ameyaw v McGoldrick [2020] EWHC 1741 (QB) offers a cautionary tale about McKenzie Friends and what they can and can’t do for you in court. [read post]
4 Jul 2020, 9:56 am
  And so, even as a great many peoples worship the idea of the formless, they cannot help but provide manifestations of that formlessness as a bridge (and then ultimately as the thing itself). [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 10:33 pm by Jeff Richardson
"  The other big decision this week was in the DACA case Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 6:38 am by Linda McClain
I am grateful to contributors Aziza Ahmed, Dale Carpenter, Imer Flores, Cathleen Kaveny, Randall Kennedy, and Andrew Koppelman for their insightful and instructive comments. [read post]