Search for: "People v Lord"
Results 181 - 200
of 1,802
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Sep 2023, 12:33 am
You can also read the essays of the runners-up here. 2023 Winning Essay byAlexis Boddy In a judgment by the House of Lords in 2003, Lord Hoffman discussed the importance of individual human rights in democratic societies. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 12:59 pm
Texas law enforcement officers (troopers, police officers, deputies) arrest people then interrogate them and take people into interrogation rooms for questioning as part of crime investigation routinely. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 1:07 am
Lady Hale, Lord Reed and Lord Hughes concurred in both judgments. [read post]
26 May 2016, 4:30 am
NGN is entitled to publish articles criticising people in the public eye. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 2:11 am
The Lord Advocate replies that this is a fair observation. [read post]
Lord Justices Floyd and Arnold disagree on the inventiveness of expandable hoses [2020] EWCA Civ 871
24 Jul 2020, 12:29 am
The difficultly inherent in the case was reflected by the disagreement between the two patent specialist judges who heard the case, Lord Justices Arnold and Floyd. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 4:38 am
R(Ahmad) v LB Newham [2009] UKHL 14 is now available and the Lords have done a pretty good job at destroying the jurisprudence built up by the High Court and Court of Appeal in Part 6 cases. [read post]
24 May 2022, 4:00 am
Wade and Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
28 Oct 2022, 4:49 am
Holger Kircher);December 5: the Ericsson v. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 12:45 am
This issue was considered at length in Lord Browne of Madingley v Associated Newspapers Ltd [2008] QB 103. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 7:23 am
If she chooses to deport people to states where torture is endemic, those people must be able to challenge that decision in an impartial tribunal. [read post]
Case Comment: R (Steinfeld & Anor) v Secretary of State for International Development [2018] UKSC 32
28 Jun 2018, 7:15 am
Judgment in the case of R (Steinfeld & Anor) v Secretary of State for International Development [2018] UKSC 32 is here. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 4:09 pm
He noted that two people who had reacted to the protest made by the Appellants were charged and convicted for their actions. [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 1:42 am
One aspect of this issue was covered in my post on the case of Ntuli v Donald ([2010] EWCA Civ 1276). [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 10:00 pm
Section 3 of the Representation of the People Act 1983 remains unamended by the rulings in Hirst v United Kingdom (No 2) (2006) 42 EHRR 849 and Greens and MT v United Kingdom (23 November 2010) that it offends against Article 3 Protocol 1 by imposing a blanket ban on prisoners from participating in elections. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 12:17 pm
Paris v. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 12:33 am
Summary This case relates to a point of statutory construction in the Representation of the People Act 1983, s 90C(1)(a). [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 4:00 am
Tort Law for Cynics Dan Priel Modern Law Review, Volume 77 (2014) Introduction Back in 1949 Lord Justice Denning had an occasion to consider the rules imposing tort liability on the actions of people of unsound mind. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 1:30 am
” 15.57 Eadie QC discusses the possibility of a single line Act of Parliament, which he says created a difficulty for the respondents as it makes no sense in the context where Parliament has put that very question to the people by way of a referendum. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 11:06 pm
In difficult cases which involve more people or potentially serious failings by the state, the investigative obligation can also lead to the requirement to conduct public inquiries. [read post]
