Search for: "People v Mitchell" Results 181 - 200 of 626
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Oct 2010, 3:47 pm by Brian Shiffrin
Such a claim was successful in People v Mitchell (2010 NY Slip Op 06926 [4th Dept 10/01/10]) in which the Court held thatThe evidence at trial established only that defendant constructively possessed the firearms with respect to the criminal possession of a weapon counts of which he was convicted, and thus the People proved only a single actus reus (see People v Laureano, 87 NY2d 640, 643; People v Hunt, 52 AD3d 1312, lv denied… [read post]
6 Mar 2009, 1:25 am
View the article here 03/06/2009 By Karamagi Rujumba, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette Robert V. [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 5:42 am by Anthony Gaughan
As Justice Brennan noted in his concurring opinion in New York Times Co. v. [read post]
25 Aug 2021, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
Mitchell, but she added that she disagrees with Mitchell and continues to believe that hate crime laws penalize free speech. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 5:50 am by jonathanturley
You will be hearing arguments from:  Jonathan Mitchell, who is representing Trump. [read post]
31 Jan 2007, 10:40 am
These people should have come forward sooner, and they should now urgently consider coming forward to testify publicly - and with documents. [read post]
22 May 2014, 9:10 am by Jeff Foust
” DalBello specifically recommended that people read the transcript of Rogozin’s May 13th remarks. [read post]
15 Oct 2009, 12:20 pm
  The Court also granted leave to appeal in People v. [read post]