Search for: "People v Roy"
Results 181 - 200
of 513
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jan 2017, 4:08 pm
Roy Greenslade is giving up his valuable and insightful daily media blog in the Guardian. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 1:25 am
A judge has barred journalists from naming four people mounting a fresh High Court Brexit challenge in reports on the case. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 12:35 pm
As attorney general, he became known for his removal of Alabama Chief Justice Roy Moore for Moore’s refusal to follow a federal court order to remove a Ten Commandments monument from the state Supreme Court building. [read post]
13 Dec 2016, 4:44 pm
The last of these was R v France (Anthony) [2016] EWCA Crim 1588 (Case summary: [2016] WLR (D) 566.) [read post]
13 Dec 2016, 4:44 pm
The last of these was R v France (Anthony) [2016] EWCA Crim 1588 (Case summary: [2016] WLR (D) 566.) [read post]
11 Dec 2016, 11:54 pm
The New South Wales government has called for national laws to allow people to sue for damages for serious invasions of privacy, as it pursues separate state-based reforms to criminalise revenge porn. [read post]
1 Dec 2016, 7:37 am
(Campbell v. [read post]
27 Nov 2016, 4:06 pm
The call to overturn the conviction has come after it was revealed that Trinity Mirror handed over evidence about Norman to the police to save people ‘further up the tree. [read post]
20 Nov 2016, 4:20 pm
Many of the claimants were friends or family of the famous people targeted by journalists. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 12:25 am
”As Roy Greenslade has pointed out in the Guardian, the press has denied any wrongdoing. [read post]
10 Nov 2016, 9:01 pm
(See Hurley v. [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 3:06 pm
A pair of favored examples are Liebeck v McDonald’s Restaurants, aka “The Hot Coffee Case,” and Pearson v Chung, or “The Pants Lawsuit. [read post]
6 Nov 2016, 4:14 pm
Hysteria broke out across the Europhobic tabloid press with the judges being dubbed “the enemies of the people”. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 5:47 am
Well over 250 people registered for the program and I kind of wanted to whisper to people: “You know this is just a LEGAL seminar, right? [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 9:01 pm
In the 1964 case of New York Times v. [read post]
30 Oct 2016, 5:05 pm
This role was exposed in last week’s judgment in R v Norman ([2016] EWCA Crim 1564) which was discussed on the Panopticon blog Roy Greenslade in the Guardian said that the “wrong people were prosecuted over journalists’ payments to police,” and that the police should have been investigating Rupert Murdoch’s publishing business instead of France. [read post]
23 Oct 2016, 4:05 pm
Roy Greenslade in the Guardian has questioned why News UK continued to employ Mahmood, “ignoring every warning sign about Mahmood’s dodgy form of investigative journalism”. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 1:39 pm
Of his vote in Schenck v. [read post]
16 Oct 2016, 4:08 pm
People should think about their own conduct. [read post]
5 Sep 2016, 7:13 am
In the end, the public interest argument must be, as Roy Greenslade says: “Elected politicians, people responsible for making laws, must live by different standards to those who vote for them. [read post]
