Search for: "People v Stokes" Results 181 - 200 of 223
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Sep 2011, 8:41 am by Rick Hasen
The Grand Jury found that over a period of 14 years, a group of people committed blatant voter registration and voting fraud to defeat opponents who challenged the status quo control of electoral politics in the borough. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 1:42 pm by Eugene Volokh
”For a more recent, but factually rather different, § 403 case, see McMahon v. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 4:15 pm by Charon QC
RollonFriday are now offering their own award (Pictured) The BBC reports: Thousands ‘ripped off’ by unregulated will-writers: “Thousands of people are being ripped off by companies providing unregulated services such as will writing, claims the first Legal Ombudsman. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 7:00 am by Enchanta Jackson
It is common within Latino communities for people to reject any resemblance of their native ancestry. [read post]
6 May 2011, 7:16 am by David Lat
But when we do have both sides available to us, we present them.In the case of the People v. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 7:47 am by Michelle O'Neil
” These V-Day gone south scenarios are enough to make even the most secure of us jump off the deep end. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 9:06 am by GuestPost
[Case Reference: Mary Stokes (on behalf of her son John Stokes) v Christian Brothers’ High School, Clonmel and The Department of Education and Skills 7 December 2010 Equality Officer Decision DEC-S2010-056)] Related PostsNovember 5, 2010 -- Underspending on Schools: Violating the Right to Education? [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 5:03 am by Howard Wasserman
Would such a rally still be a bridge too far, so that even those stoking flames against the "Muslim Enemy" would recoil? [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 3:06 pm by J
Birmingham do not appear to be the only authority to obtain such orders in the last year or so, Stoke and Warwickshire have, apparently, also succeeded. [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 6:37 am by David Bernstein
  The report is not quite right; it says that Wieseltier accused Sullivan of anti-Semitism, when Wieseltier actually accused Sullivan of recklessly engaging in venomous rhetoric that gives aid and comfort to anti-Semites and stokes anti-Semitism. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 7:00 am by Dave
In Barber v Croydon LBC [2010] EWCA Civ 51, the Court of Appeal found Croydon’s decision to pursue possession proceedings of a non-secure tenancy occupied by Mr Barber Wednesbury unreasonable, being by my estimation the third such successful use of a gateway (b) defence in the higher courts (after Doherty itself and McGlynn). [read post]
26 Aug 2009, 8:39 pm
Chrylser L.L.C., 481 Mich. 266 (2008), and People v. [read post]