Search for: "People v Ties" Results 181 - 200 of 2,465
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jun 2023, 7:09 pm by Jacob Fishman
In addition to examining the enforcement perils tied to white supremacist counterterrorism, this Article introduces the concept of “surveillance relapse. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 1:57 pm by Elin Hofverberg
Soon Gustav gathered a group of men from Dalarna, who in Västerås fought all the Danes to flee, and asked archbishop Gustav to not use his troops against his own people but instead against the enemies of the church; but he did not listen and became the enemy of the prince; was banished and sent to Denmark. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 8:41 am by Eugene Volokh
The University of Chicago law school website shows 62 "full time reaching faculty" v. 127 "Lecturers in Law" (another—and, to some ears, a more dignified—term for adjuncts). [read post]
26 May 2023, 6:15 am by Edgar Chen
The transaction raised eyebrows due to Sun’s ties to the CCP and his former military service with the People’s Liberation Army (PLA). [read post]
24 May 2023, 1:13 pm by Ben Sperry
A traditional telephone company laid physical wires to create a network connecting people. [read post]
16 May 2023, 6:30 am by Sabina Henneberg
The Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) Project, which seeks to measure democracy globally, identified eight countries in 2022 that “bounced back” from authoritarianism after having previously made democratic gains. [read post]
14 May 2023, 6:56 pm
 It is with that in mind that I take this opportunity to let people know that I have posted a new discussion draft, "Chinese State-Owned Companies and Investment in Latin America and Europe. [read post]
14 May 2023, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
For the Balkinization symposium on Julie Suk, After Misogyny: How the Law Fails Women and What to Do about It (University of California Press, 2023).Julie SukMany thanks to Jack Balkin for hosting this symposium on After Misogyny: How the Law Fails Women and What to Do about It, and to Paula Monopoli, Deborah Dinner, Victoria Nourse, Katharine Young, and Linda McClain for their comments and questions which are as generous as they are challenging. [read post]
11 May 2023, 9:00 pm by Vikram David Amar
But that notion is inconsistent with the seminal compelled-speech case, Wooley v. [read post]
7 May 2023, 7:42 am by Eric Goldman
Dart because the sheriff’s letter in that case “threatened criminal sanctions if the credit card companies did not sever ties with the website,” which Sen. [read post]