Search for: "People v Warden" Results 181 - 200 of 223
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Dec 2008, 11:45 am
Warden, Maryland Penitentiary, 438 F.2d 786 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 408 U.S. 942 (1972). [read post]
13 Jul 2008, 4:50 am
Finding people in this case to be "articles of commerce," the majority found the statute to be a form of unconstitutional discrimination against out-of-state commerce. [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 8:27 am
Warden, Adolescent Receiving Detention CenterKINGS COUNTYReal PropertyNotice of Pendency That Expired Six Years Ago Deemed a Nullity, Cannot Be ExtendedNYCTL 1998-1 Trust v. [read post]
6 Jun 2008, 4:22 pm
  It would be the fifth in America this year, following the Supreme Court ruling in Baze v. [read post]
5 Jun 2008, 2:39 pm
And once the witnesses were in place, Osborne shook his head "no" when Warden Hilton Hall asked if he had any final words. [read post]
27 May 2008, 9:50 am
P. 35(b) motion claiming that warden's alleged promise to create an opportunity for a sentence reduction as a reward for his assistance in prison effectively bound the government to file a Rule 35(b) motion on his behalf, judgment denying relief is affirmed where: 1) even if the warden did promise to file a Rule 35(b) motion, a warden within the Bureau of Prisons was unauthorized to make the motion as the "government" under Rule 35(b); and 2) a… [read post]
5 May 2008, 11:23 am
This is definitely a powerful way to begin an opinion:"At Petitioner Troy Brown's trial for sexual assault, the Warden and State's ("Respondents") deoxyribonucleic acid ("DNA") expert provided critical testimony that was later proved to be inaccurate and misleading. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 12:13 pm
Grant of habeas relief vacating petitioner's sentence of death, and ordering that he be resentenced to receive a sentence other than death, is affirmed where the Double Jeopardy Clause bars respondent-warden's claim that, even though petitioner was found to be mentally retarded on direct appeal, Ohio should be permitted to relitigate the finding now that it has taken on new legal significance in light of Atkins v. [read post]
26 Feb 2008, 9:08 am
Supreme Court ruled in Panetti v. [read post]
31 Jan 2008, 12:10 am
Diaz, defendants NEW YORK COUNTYInsurance LawAG's Complaint Against Bank for Violations Of Executive Law Fails to State Cause of Action People v. [read post]
11 Jan 2008, 1:56 am
Warden, Otis Bantum Correctional Center Subscription Required NASSAU COUNTYContracts Procurement Contract Directs Breach of Contract Disputes to Proceed to Arbitration; Action Stayed Incorporated Village of Freeport v. [read post]