Search for: "People v. Bird" Results 181 - 200 of 587
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Dec 2017, 5:31 pm by LundgrenJohnson
  Its preamble states: So what did the law change in practical terms and how does it impact the defenses of people accused of DWI? [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 6:20 am
talks, in turn, about director's moral rights.Weekly Roundups: Saturday Sundries[Week ending 19 November]Birss J in Accord v Research Corporation Technologies attempts to cut the red tape on the right to claim priorityThe AmeriKat Annsley invites Tristan Sherliker (Bird & Bird) to report on the recent decision of Birss J in Accord Healthcare Ltd v Research Corporation Technologies Inc [2017] EWHC 2711 addressing the issue of patent priority date. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 1:08 am by Jani Ihalainen
For example, a similar claim to the above was filed in 2015, but the case settled before being decided.Even so, the case of Agence France Presse v Morel offers some guidance. [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 5:17 pm by Larry
Or, perhaps, batteries sold in New Zealand have to be slightly larger than their U.S. equivalents to prevent choking in kiwis (the birds, not the people). [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 1:27 pm by Érika Bergeron-Drolet
Does this mean that copyright issues involving tattoos are only relevant to people living in the limelight, or can copyright also affect how ordinary people get and live with their tattoos? [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 1:27 pm by Érika Bergeron-Drolet
Does this mean that copyright issues involving tattoos are only relevant to people living in the limelight, or can copyright also affect how ordinary people get and live with their tattoos? [read post]
18 Aug 2017, 4:12 am by SHG
Is a bird in the hand worth two in the bush? [read post]