Search for: "People v. Coke"
Results 181 - 200
of 250
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Feb 2017, 4:31 am
Some would argue that to blame the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984, but not the Supreme Court’s decision in Mistretta v. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 7:24 am
The purpose of imposing this 3-cents-an-ounce sugar-sweetened beverage tax is to allow people to get their kids educated and move them out of poverty into taxpaying citizens.[4] Consistent with this revenue-centric approach, diet beverages were included in the tax to try to maximize its revenue potential, despite not contributing to caloric intake. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 7:48 am
Gov’t shouldn’t instruct people what to buy. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 1:27 pm
LTTB v. [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 10:08 am
This court in People's Union for Democratic Rights & Others v. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 3:00 am
Shelby v. [read post]
8 May 2008, 4:23 pm
They are basically using the same argument under which a right to privacy was found under Roe v. [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 1:02 pm
” “Brands use logos to impress values, functions, and hierarchies on millions of people. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 4:06 am
And in Cooper v. [read post]
18 Jul 2008, 8:39 pm
In a case known as Mapp v. [read post]
5 Jul 2008, 11:05 am
interview: (IP tango) Events 7 July: PLI briefing webcast ‘Life after Quanta v LGE: What every patent lawyer needs to know’: (PLI), 7-15 July/16-18 July: 2nd Transatlantic IP summer academy, modules one and two – Alicante/Milan: (IPKat), 9 July 2008: ALI & ABA webcast ‘Quanta v LG: What you should know’: (Patent Docs), 11 July: CIPA moot to improve participants’ understanding of procedures of EPO Technical… [read post]
13 Jul 2019, 1:49 pm
Nugent v. [read post]
21 Apr 2012, 12:42 pm
’” United States v. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 10:43 am
True of drinking Coke; true of luxury goods? [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 12:20 pm
LegalForce RAPC Worldwide P.C. v. [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 9:55 am
Cockrum v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:28 am
Jacob: real consumers in the box are perfectly normal people. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 7:13 pm
The case is Hanson v. [read post]
30 Sep 2007, 2:47 pm
., New Coke? [read post]
18 May 2017, 9:47 am
“Nope,” said the Ninth Circuit in the recent case of Elliott v. [read post]
