Search for: "People v. Conte" Results 181 - 200 of 259
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Dec 2013, 2:16 pm
It is to be noted that the key is whether the defendant has been afforded an opportunity to refute those aggravating factors which may have negatively influenced the court as held in People v. [read post]
10 Dec 2013, 3:27 pm by Stephen Bilkis
It is a collateral consequence of a conviction for a sex offense designed not to punish, but rather to protect the public as in People v. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 5:20 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Static Control didn’t have antitrust standing federally, per 6th Cir.Rebecca Tushnet - Georgetown University Law Center, representing amicus curiae, Law ProfessorsWhy should people who are primarily interested in TM care? [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 2:34 pm
Otherwise, an offender could avoid sex offender registration requirements simply by moving his or her state of residence, thereby frustrating the purpose behind sex offender registration laws as in People v. [read post]
24 Nov 2013, 2:36 pm by Stephen Bilkis
However, in Mental Hygiene Legal Serv. v Spitzer (2007), the court enjoined the operation of this provision of the statute because it held that the continued detention of a respondent in every case following a probable cause determination but prior to a trial was "inherently coercive" and a violation of constitutional due process. [read post]
23 Nov 2013, 2:31 pm by Stephen Bilkis
That traditional approach was liberalized by the New York Court of Appeals in the cases of People v Stone (1974) and People v Sugden (1974). [read post]
16 Nov 2013, 4:31 pm by Stephen Bilkis
At the time of defendant's trial, polygraph tests had not been proven to be reliable as held in People v Leone. [read post]