Search for: "People v. Good (1990)"
Results 181 - 200
of 1,298
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 May 2022, 4:05 pm
Eleonora Maria Mazzoli argues that, in a world where social media and search engines have become integral to how people find and access information and news online, an approach focused on a negative rights philosophy is insufficient. [read post]
28 May 2022, 2:25 pm
First, it’s ridiculous to call the Castle Rock v. [read post]
19 May 2022, 2:04 pm
IDEA OF ROE (rights as a political concept) Vs the JURISPRUDENCE OF ROE (debate over state regulatory policy) [long term strategic consequences of reframing the Debate (evident from the early 1990s—Calvo and Rosenstone 1989 Pilot Study]. [read post]
18 May 2022, 4:00 am
One day we were discussing Int'l Societyy for Krishna Consciousness, Inc. v. [read post]
12 May 2022, 6:32 pm
” People v. [read post]
12 May 2022, 7:21 am
It is gradually destroying Ukraine’s solvency as an independent state and the hope of its people in an independent future. [read post]
10 May 2022, 9:02 pm
Wade in Dobbs v. [read post]
7 May 2022, 8:48 am
” People ex rel. [read post]
3 May 2022, 5:38 am
Cash money has a strange effect on people. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 6:30 am
Had one looked at this issue in 1921, the United States would have had company: At that time, Australia and Canada, countries that, like the United States, were influenced by the British tradition, provided judges with indefinite tenure during good behavior.[3]However, each of these countries amended their constitutions and adopted mandatory retirement ages for their federal judges later in the 20thcentury – 70 in Australia, 75 in Canada. [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 9:01 am
Doe v. [read post]
19 Apr 2022, 2:36 pm
In other words, good luck trying to easily reconcile the Second Circuit’s decision in the Warhol case itself from its previous opinion in Cariou v. [read post]
18 Apr 2022, 9:28 pm
See United States v. [read post]
13 Apr 2022, 4:30 am
In a case on the plenary docket, Ramirez v. [read post]
29 Mar 2022, 4:00 am
The story of how Indigenous peoples were included within the state could be avoided with bland statements—such as, “there was from the outset never any doubt that sovereignty and legislative power, and indeed the underlying title, to [Aboriginal] lands vested in the Crown” (R v Sparrow, [1990] 1 SCR 1075, Dickson C.J. and La Forest J. at 1103). [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am
The State's immunity waiver applies equally to its municipal subdivisions, including cities (see Valdez v City of New York, 18 NY3d 69, 75 [2011]; Florence v Goldberg, 44 NY2d 189, 195 [1978]). [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am
The State's immunity waiver applies equally to its municipal subdivisions, including cities (see Valdez v City of New York, 18 NY3d 69, 75 [2011]; Florence v Goldberg, 44 NY2d 189, 195 [1978]). [read post]
24 Feb 2022, 5:56 am
Shen v. [read post]
22 Feb 2022, 6:01 am
The central part of the 117-page opinion, captioned Texas v. [read post]
18 Feb 2022, 2:22 pm
Sega v. [read post]
