Search for: "People v. Jenkins"
Results 181 - 200
of 228
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Sep 2009, 8:54 am
Stephen Daniel works at Jenkins & Jenkins, P.C. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 1:47 pm
New Massachusetts companies. [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 6:31 pm
Lucent v. [read post]
25 Aug 2009, 3:12 pm
Hannah, Esq. discusses Jenkins v Jenkins, ___ F.3d ___ (6th Cir. 2009). [read post]
6 Aug 2009, 7:16 am
Frank was probably referring to the SEC enforcement action in SEC v. [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 9:14 am
Justice Jenkins ("Go Seahawks! [read post]
18 Jul 2009, 5:05 am
Joe dialed toned the guy.At the time there were only a few people who knew I was here. [read post]
17 May 2009, 1:43 pm
There's a skip here (don't know how much of the speech is lost between video #1 and video #2) OBAMA: Thank you, Father Jenkins for that generous introduction. [read post]
14 May 2009, 9:00 pm
U.S. v. [read post]
14 Apr 2009, 10:01 pm
See U.S. v. [read post]
11 Apr 2009, 7:38 am
Supreme Court, In U.S. v. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 7:04 am
Jenkins v. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 12:42 am
Nor can anyone plausibly claim that Americans meant to authorize judges to decide such matters as the boundaries of public morality when they approved that language.The court's ruling in Jenkins v. [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 6:33 pm
This new law was followed by Florida’s Supreme Court in Jenkins v. [read post]
30 Jan 2009, 2:11 am
., Anderson v. [read post]
1 Jan 2009, 7:14 am
United States v. [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 5:30 pm
Zalat v. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 9:05 pm
People v. [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 8:32 pm
The Court held that"The threshold issue in evaluating whether a resentence is vindictive is whether the resentence is more severe than that originally imposed" (People v Cahill, 46 AD3d 1455, 1456; see generally People v Young, 94 NY2d 171, 176-177, rearg denied 94 NY2d 876; People v Van Pelt, 76 NY2d 156, 159-160), and a determinate sentence of 25 years is of course more severe than one of 20 years. [read post]
13 Nov 2008, 3:45 pm
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, November 05, 2008 US v. [read post]
