Search for: "People v. Julian" Results 181 - 200 of 383
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 May 2023, 1:53 am by INFORRM
Attending Capita’s AGM, the campaigners called on the company’s Managing Director for Electronic Monitoring to watch and respond to recorded testimonies of people fitted by the surveillance devices. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 1:37 am by INFORRM
Patel indicated she is considering requiring sites like Facebook and Twitter to retain details of the identities of people posting material which could be handed over to police investigating crimes. [read post]
5 Dec 2021, 4:39 pm by INFORRM
The Guardian considers how, and if, the proposed changes will help ordinary people pursue a defamation claim. [read post]
12 Nov 2023, 7:30 am by Gene Takagi
Philanthropic Investment in People Power (Frank Farrow, Hanh Cao Yu & Robert Ross, Stanford Social Innovation Review) Organizing for the Long Haul by Building Community (Maurice Mitchell, Nonprofit Quarterly) Letting Lived Experience Lead the Way (Eddy Zheng, Center for Effective Philanthropy) Effective Audit Committee Guide (BDO USA) Never ask job candidates to do unpaid assignments as part of your hiring process (Vu Le, Nonprofit AF) Significant Events: … [read post]
7 May 2012, 4:18 am by INFORRM
(A man v WalesOnline (Clause 1), 03/05/2012) Julian Assange complained to the PCC about the description of ‘rape charges’ against him – when in fact he has not, to date, been charged with any offence – as noted in: Mr Julian Assange v The Independent (Clause 1), 03/05/2012; and Mr Julian Assange v Daily Mail (Clause 1) 03/05/2012). 164 people complained about a Sun’s columnist claims about the medical… [read post]
29 May 2022, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Eleonora Maria Mazzoli argues that, in a world where social media and search engines have become integral to how people find and access information and news online, an approach focused on a negative rights philosophy is insufficient. [read post]
12 Jan 2022, 6:47 am by Allan Blutstein
Julian, with its purposivist betrayal of the statutory text, I just shake my head. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 10:59 pm by Graeme Hall
See our recent post regarding the Supreme Court’s guidance on live text-based communications Julian Assange’s extradition hearing – Head of Legal: Carl Gardner writes the Wikileaks founder, Julian Assange, is likely to be extradited back to Sweden. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 4:07 am by INFORRM
China The Fei Chan Dao blog has published a translation of a Notice expelling Zhang Guilin, Former Director of the State-Owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission of the Beijing People’s Government, from the Party and Public Office for “serious violations of discipline and law. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 1:11 am by INFORRM
On the same day, Julian Knowles J handed down judgement in the case of Crosbie v Ley [2023] EWHC 2626 (KB) in favour of the defendant. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 12:24 pm by rainey Reitman
The government recently released a superseding indictment[1] against Wikileaks editor in chief Julian Assange, currently imprisoned and awaiting extradition in the United Kingdom. [read post]
17 Aug 2014, 5:11 pm by INFORRM
 They were as follows: Social Media: How many people use Twitter and what do we think about it? [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 12:31 am by Melina Padron
February 28, 2011 Adam Julian Assange must face rape charges in Sweden, rules court February 24, 2011 Adam Wagner Will churches really be sued for not allowing civil partnerships? [read post]
4 Mar 2017, 4:34 pm by Chuck Cosson
  Julian Assange reportedly stated that this strategy was at the root of his efforts with WikiLeaks which, ironically, he aimed at “authoritarian” political parties.[3] Such publication can also undermine rule of law by reinforcing an ends-justify-the means value system. [read post]
12 Feb 2023, 5:03 pm by INFORRM
Last week in the courts On 8 February 2023, Julian Knowles J dismissed the defendant’s application in Dr Saeed Shehabi and Moosa Mohamme v The Kingdom of Bahrain [2023] EWHC 89 (KB) to dismiss the claim for want of jurisdiction. [read post]