Search for: "People v. Lines" Results 181 - 200 of 13,315
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Mar 2024, 1:57 pm by NARF
Taking the land back: How to return stolen land to the Indigenous people of New York State through eminent domain. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 4:56 pm by INFORRM
  All of these developments required people taking cases (that is behaviour) which has not been “ordinarily encountered” in litigation. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 8:13 am by Marty Lederman
Here are a few preliminary thoughts about the Court’s decision yesterday in Trump v. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
I was not surprised by the outcome or even the unanimity of the result in Trump v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 6:05 pm by Mark Ashton
” But judicial interviews of children need more nuance than punching your ticket on the PATH (a rail line in North Jersey). [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 7:15 pm by Barbara Moreno
Johnson, ed., Annotations to Surplus Lines Statutes (2023). [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 10:10 am by Catherine Reach
For example type =lorem(2,2) on a new line and press enter to create: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 6:05 am by Katherine Yon Ebright
A long line of cases endorses the principle that “[w]ho is the sovereign, de jure or de facto, of a territory is not a judicial, but is a political question, the determin [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 12:28 am by centerforartlaw
On a museum’s website, viewing an image of a Warhol painting, visitors will read a copyright line under the reproduction, “© 2024 Andy Warhol Foundation / ARS, NY / TM Licensed by Campbell’s Soup Co. [read post]
24 Feb 2024, 1:10 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
 People will game them in all sorts of ways that dilute their information, whether that’s product review manipulation or otherwise. [read post]
24 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  The third part examines certain general institutional characteristics of the Taft Court’s work, including both the extent to which its varied members recognized “shared norms” of proper judicial behavior and the extent to which, often reluctantly, they wrote opinions that revealed the lines of their most salient disagreements. [read post]