Search for: "People v. Noah" Results 181 - 200 of 209
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Mar 2014, 9:17 am
Then, once p was agreed to be 1, people came to blows over the number of natures of Christ (ch). [read post]
28 Dec 2019, 8:33 am
  In some sense, this was also the great year of Jew baiting--everyone, it seems, had something to say about the People of Israel, even as their actions usually belied their words. [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 11:30 pm by Dáire McCormack-George
The internal dimension is the inherent capacity which people have—this will vary amongst populations. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 6:28 pm
It had its legal beginning in 1896, when the Supreme Court rendered a decision known as the Plessy v. [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 7:12 am
For example, we impose cultural categories on people in every interaction, so even if people try to mask their identity online, they can't really escape. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 9:16 am by Roshonda Scipio
. : Lexington Books, c2010.ChinaKNQ500 .L53 2010The draft civil code of the People's Republic of China : English translation / (prepared by the Legislative Research Group of Chinese Academy of Social Sciences) ; by Liang Huixing ; translated from the Chinese by Junwei Fu ... [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 6:00 am by Sandy Levinson
  There is, of course, yet a third meaning of “fixed” that is available, as when people speak of “fixing” their dogs or cats, by which they mean neutering the animals and making it impossible for them to generate a next generation of puppies or kittens. [read post]
30 Oct 2021, 9:26 pm by David Kopel
Supreme Court on the Second Amendment to right to bear arms, New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
Since President Biden issued his July 2021 Executive Order on Competition, the antitrust agencies have made broad policy statements promising more aggressive enforcement and have initiated a number of high-profile enforcement actions. [read post]
4 Mar 2017, 4:34 pm by Chuck Cosson
  Hypocrisy makes people uneasy because it suggests unfairness:  someone gets credit for holding a professed view without “doing the work” of acting on, or receiving the consequences of that view.[1] This form of human perception is not necessarily wrong:  in some cases the public position is indeed a dishonest front for the speaker’s real agenda. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 7:15 pm by Barbara Moreno
Samantha Barbas, Actual Malice:  Civil Rights and Freedom of the Press in New York Times v. [read post]
17 Aug 2022, 5:00 am by Svetlana S. Gans and Natalie Hausknecht
”   Commissioner Noah Phillips’ dissent criticized the ANPRM for failing to provide “notice of anything” and thus stripping the public of its participation rights. [read post]
31 May 2018, 12:01 pm by Anthony Gaughan
Baron’s essay challenges Scalia’s opinion in District of Columbia v. [read post]