Search for: "People v. Paul" Results 181 - 200 of 3,137
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Nov 2017, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
Dr Paul Wragg, Editor in Chief, Communications Law, Associate Professor of Law, University of Leeds, Associate Academic Fellow, Inner Temple [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 9:51 am by Kent Scheidegger
"Paul Clement and K&S represent the prison inmates seeking release in Brown v. [read post]
8 Jun 2019, 1:22 am by INFORRM
The Court of Appeal agreed that the existing, case-by-case approach recommended in V v T should be adopted, and that trust variation approval cases were different from settlement approval cases such as JX MX (A Child) v Dartford and Gravesham NHS Trust (above). [read post]
15 Jun 2007, 2:48 am
As a followup on the interrelationship of KSR v. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 12:25 am by INFORRM
The ICO plans to write to more than 1,000 companies, which it believes are involved in buying and selling people’s names and numbers, as part of its ongoing crackdown on cold callers. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 12:13 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
Adler) The WSJ’s Jess Bravin reports on an interview with recently retired Justice John Paul Stevens in which he defended his “most unpopular opinion” — Kelo v. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 2:08 am by rhapsodyinbooks
As you know by now, in the opinion issued in Shelby County v. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 10:41 pm by Eugene Volokh
(Eugene Volokh) An interesting National Law Journal op-ed from Clark Neily and Paul Sherman of the Institute for Justice, about a case of theirs, Locke v. [read post]
5 Apr 2021, 7:19 am by Public Employment Law Press
Denial of Correction Officer’s Performance of Duty Retirement Benefits Annulled Due to Factual Errors - Matter of Paul Mazzotte v Thomas DiNapoli, as State Comptroller Petitioner was a correction officer for over 20 years. [read post]
5 Apr 2021, 7:19 am by Public Employment Law Press
Denial of Correction Officer’s Performance of Duty Retirement Benefits Annulled Due to Factual Errors - Matter of Paul Mazzotte v Thomas DiNapoli, as State Comptroller Petitioner was a correction officer for over 20 years. [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 12:41 pm by Donald Thompson
We should respond that these questions address the ability of a potential juror to be fair and impartial, an area of inquiry in which a trial court is more apt to commit error (see CPL § 270.20[1][b]; People v Arnold, 96 NY2d 358 [2001]; People v Johnson, 94 NY2d 600 [2000]; People v Lewis, 71 AD3d 1582 [4th Dept 2010]; People v Habte, 35 AD3d 1199 [4th  Dept 2006]). [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 2:02 pm by Paul Smith
Paul Smith is the vice president of Litigation and Strategy at the Campaign Legal Center. [read post]
16 Apr 2023, 12:37 am by Frank Cranmer
Revd Paul Williamson in court again In July 1997, the Revd Paul Williamson was made the subject of a Civil Proceedings Order as a vexatious litigant pursuant to s.42(1A) Senior Courts Act 1981 (Restriction of vexatious legal proceedings), primarily as a result of a series of proceedings arising from his opposition to the ordination of women: see R v HM Attorney-General ex parte Reverend Paul Stewart Williamson [1997] EWHC Admin 691. [read post]