Search for: "People v. Smith (1986)"
Results 181 - 200
of 217
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Aug 2010, 6:54 am
Taylor v. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 3:26 pm
Pennsylvania (1986), which allows a judge to find facts that trigger a mandatory minimum sentence. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 5:00 pm
New Jersey Assault Charges - NJSA 2C:12-1 § 2C:12-1. [read post]
26 Jun 2010, 7:31 am
” People v. [read post]
19 Jun 2010, 12:00 am
PEOPLE v. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 5:21 am
Kasper (1986), 37 C.C.L.T. 270 (B.C.C.A.); and McEllistrum v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 5:03 pm
MANRIQUEZ, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. [read post]
12 May 2010, 8:43 am
Smith, 539 U.S. 510 (2003), and even the Court’s summary reversal of the Eleventh Circuit on ineffective assistance grounds from earlier this Term, Porter v. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 10:44 am
Click Here American Trucking Association et al. v. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 5:43 am
See Reynolds v. [read post]
13 Feb 2010, 1:32 pm
Smith, 2 Wn.2d 118, 98 P.2d 647 (1939) (individual charged with larceny could not be convicted of embezzlement). [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 6:19 pm
Freitas (Freitas I), 800 F.2d 1451, 1456 (9th Cir. 1986) (internal citations omitted). [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 10:00 am
The tenant protections provided by the State's rent regulation laws have long been an essential measure to ensuring New York City accommodates people with a broad range of incomes, and today's decision means fewer units will fall out of the system than otherwise would have. [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 6:31 pm
Smith emphasized his choice of a running royalty over a lump-sum payment. [read post]
6 Sep 2009, 9:25 am
People v. [read post]
19 Jul 2009, 2:07 pm
As early as 1986, Scalia gave a speech exhorting originalists to "change the label from the Doctrine of Original Intent to the Doctrine of Original Meaning. [read post]
3 Jul 2009, 2:23 pm
Commissioners, 491 So. 2d 1109 (Fla. 1986); White v. [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 9:53 pm
Christine Bruhn at the University of California, Davis published many of the pioneering studies on consumer acceptance, and recently made this comment about consumer acceptance of food irradiation in a series on the new FDA rule published by Jim Prevor’s Perishable Pundit (2008): “My work and that of other researchers over the last 20 years has found some people are ready to buy irradiated product right now….This group of consumers represents maybe 10 percent… [read post]
21 Dec 2008, 9:00 pm
Co., 237 S.C. 133, 139-40, 115 S.E.2d 793, 796 (1960); Stanley Smith & Sons v. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 11:50 am
Vanderloo, 386 N.W.2d 108, 116 (Iowa 1986).Kentucky: Larkin v. [read post]
