Search for: "People v. Smith (1988)"
Results 181 - 200
of 222
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jun 2010, 5:00 pm
New Jersey Assault Charges - NJSA 2C:12-1 § 2C:12-1. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 5:03 pm
MANRIQUEZ, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 1:55 pm
” People v. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 4:45 pm
Compare Jobe v. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 8:12 am
In People v. [read post]
13 Feb 2010, 1:32 pm
Irizarry, 111 Wn.2d 591, 592, 763 P.2d 432 (1988); State v. [read post]
15 Jan 2010, 8:06 am
The responsibility of the state to provide exculpatory evidence to the defense was articulated in the 1963 Supreme Court ruling in Brady v. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 7:16 pm
By contrast, Judge Smith in dissent, while not using that analogy exactly, gets the point across:"The right of confrontation includes -- indeed, is, at its core -- the right to meet one's accuser face to face (Coy v Iowa, 487 US 1012, 1016 [1988]). [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 6:19 pm
Greenwood, 486 U.S. 35, 41 (1988) (holding that “a person has no legitimate expectation of privacy in information he voluntarily turns over to third parties” (quoting Smith v. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 10:00 am
The tenant protections provided by the State's rent regulation laws have long been an essential measure to ensuring New York City accommodates people with a broad range of incomes, and today's decision means fewer units will fall out of the system than otherwise would have. [read post]
10 Oct 2009, 5:55 am
Disproportionate Number of Outbreaks due to Raw Milk Consumption: Only ~1% of people drink raw milk in the United States, yet raw dairy products cause over 50% of the milkborne outbreaks W [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 11:00 am
In assessing the likelihood of plaintiff's success upon the merits (see Doe v Axelrod, 73 NY2d 748, 750 [1988]), the Appellate Division held that "the Governor's purported appointment of Mr. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 4:30 am
They save people's lives every day - that's their job - and not incidentally they prescribe our clients' products while doing that. [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 6:31 pm
Smith emphasized his choice of a running royalty over a lump-sum payment. [read post]
19 Jul 2009, 2:07 pm
For example, the intention behind the equal protection clause might be formulated at a relatively high level of generality--leading to the conclusion that segregation is unconstitutional--or at a very particular level--in which case the fact that the Reconstruction Congress segregated the District of Columbia schools might be thought to support the "separate but equal" principle of Plessy v. [read post]
24 May 2009, 10:45 am
" Chaplinsky v. [read post]
4 May 2009, 1:57 am
A7171A
Abbate (MS) -- Provides procedures for resolution of disputes between a public employer and Suffolk county probation officers Same as S 4872 BLURB : Civ Serv. res ds Sflk Cty pk polLast Act: 04/24/09 amend and recommit to governmental employees04/24/09 print number 7171aA7196A
Weisenberg -- Creates the mandatory ignition interlock program; repealer Same as S 27-B BLURB : V & T L. mand ignition interlock Last Act: 04/24/09 amend and… [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 2:06 am
Conte v. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 11:50 am
La. 1988), aff'd mem., 864 F.2d 789 (5th Cir. 1988).Massachusetts: Lareau v. [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 7:43 pm
Strine notes that Unocal’s board met for eight or nine hours to consider Pickens’ offer — a response to Smith v. [read post]
