Search for: "People v. Sweet" Results 181 - 200 of 495
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jul 2015, 4:28 am
 Says Merpel, while lighter sentences may be appropriate for people who have a previously clean criminal record, it is possible that the courts may wish to impose a heavier fine in the hope that it will have a detergent deterrent effect on others.The sight of one hand being registered .. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 4:34 am by Rebecca Tushnet
In TM law that’s not the same consumer at all—the purchaser of nuclear reactors as well as of sweets. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 9:30 am by azatty
I share three items on this sweet, sweet day: First, here is a story detailing where you can obtain a celebratory free doughnut today. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 6:51 am
 The courts ultimately said “no,” see Abigail Alliance v. von Eschenbach, 495 F.3d 695 (D.C. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 4:41 am by Jon Hyman
Recently, a California federal court examined this very issue in Sweet v. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 7:18 am by Joy Waltemath
” Among other reasons, the information was derived solely from LinkedIn’s transactions with the plaintiffs and not from third parties, LinkedIn was not a “consumer reporting agency” under the Act, and the list of possible references was not, itself, used or intended to be used for an employment purpose (Sweet v. [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 6:55 am by John Elwood
And that’s all we have, short and sweet. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 9:55 am by John Elwood
  New York’s Board of Education has got to be hoping the Court doesn’t do social promotion, because four repeats is usually enough for most people just to give in. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 3:31 pm
The much-awaited Supreme Court oral argument in King v. [read post]