Search for: "People v. Wells"
Results 181 - 200
of 27,421
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jun 2007, 12:09 pm
Bonilla lures the partner to an office complex, at which Keyes and Nichols commit the murder.The cops eventually catch up with Keyes -- who had been hired for previous murders as well -- and Keyes agrees to testify against Bonilla and Nichols.Bonilla gets the death penalty. [read post]
1 Nov 2007, 10:50 am
The question is what happens when a jury improperly convicts a defendant (because it's not told not to) of both theft as well as of receiving stolen property. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 2:43 pm
Well, now. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 1:12 pm
Everyone agreed he had a serious mental illness, but the trial court thought he was competent to stand trial -- as well as to represent himself -- once he was medicated. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 12:13 pm
It made no sense to claim that Melvin could have killed his wife when he was found beaten to death as well. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 1:10 pm
And I presume that if it's private property the owners can always give him a no trespassing order themselves.I'm sure that the trial judge was well-intentioned. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 1:06 pm
If 11 people keep asking me hour after hour to explain my view, and I feel like I've done so more than competently, I may well react negatively to them saying things like (as here) "Just tell me yes or no . . . . [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 11:20 am
That you can't (1) admit that you did the offense (i.e., "plead guilty" to that), but (2) say that you were insane -- and have the People agree to that as well. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 4:27 pm
Times fifty since they're (allegedly) law enforcement officers.I know that kind of (blatant) stuff goes on routinely in some other countries, even involving police officers.Just didn't know it (allegedly) happened in my back yard as well. [read post]
3 Jul 2010, 11:52 am
Further, the length of time between the two lineups was important to the decision as well. [read post]
15 Jul 2017, 6:59 pm
Ahmed v. [read post]
7 Jun 2009, 9:41 pm
A lot of people misunderstand the issues in Ricci v. [read post]
5 Nov 2008, 7:25 pm
As well as publishing (albeit somewhat belatedly).The police can't handcuff someone just because he's 6'6". [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 8:39 pm
But, trust me, that guy to whom you didn't ask any questions, or develop any record about other than the fact that he (like at least one other juror you didn't strike) also speaks Spanish; well, that ain't gonna cut it as a race-neutral explanation. [read post]
2 Aug 2023, 1:59 pm
"I certainly hope that they lose the trial transcript if I ever commit a double murder as well. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 11:39 am
It's a bad, bad crime.You might find the following additional facts surprising as well. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 11:37 am
If those things ever have illegal stuff in them, you might well be in trouble. [read post]
20 Aug 2020, 1:27 pm
But he's still looking at well over a decade in prison.No small sanction. [read post]
16 Jan 2023, 2:33 am
Street v Mumford ruled that the tenant can refuse anyone access to the property, even the Landlord. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 1:26 pm
Someone non-nutty might well have wanted to grant relief only to "ordinary" criminals, not criminals found not guilty by reason of insanity. [read post]
