Search for: "Phillips v. United States" Results 181 - 200 of 988
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jul 2010, 2:52 pm
In early 2003, the United States Postal Inspection Service began a fraud investigation of Phillips. [read post]
23 Dec 2011, 6:41 am by Marissa Miller
United States, as well as the continuing responses to Newt Gingrich’s recent criticisms of the Court and the federal judiciary. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 7:34 am by Kiran Bhat
The Court heard arguments in two cases yesterday morning, with United States v. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 12:06 pm by Amy Howe
Last year the court had asked the federal government to file a brief expressing the views of the United States on the questions presented in the case; the United States had recommended that review be denied, but today the justices nonetheless granted certiorari. [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
United States (University of Arkansas News).Weekend Roundup is a weekly feature compiled by all the Legal History bloggers. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 8:32 am by Isabel McArdle
The Government of the United States of America -v- O’Dwyer, Westminster Magistrates’ Court – Read judgment It seems appropriate, on the day when Wikipedia shut down for 24 hours to protest against US anti-piracy legislation, to talk about piracy (in the copyright sense) and what role human rights law has to play in the perpetual battle against it. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
Plaintiffs claimed that the defendants, four Chinese producers of vitamin.C, conspired to fix prices and production levels for vitamin C exported to the United States. [read post]
14 Jun 2021, 7:55 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
United States (FTCA)Paskenta Band of Nomlaki Indians v. [read post]
14 May 2012, 2:25 am by Laura Sandwell, Matrix.
Phillips v Mulcaire, heard 8 May – 10 May 2012. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 9:46 am by Daniel West, Olswang LLP
It is however an established principle of Strasbourg jurisprudence that such a right does not extend so far as to impose a positive obligation on public authorities to disclose or distribute information (see Leander v Sweden (1987) 9 EHRR 433 or Roche v United Kingdom (2005) 42 EHRR 599). [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 3:12 pm by Oliver Gayner, Olswang
  In NML Capital v Argentina, the question for the Supreme Court was whether one such investor, a New York fund that bought into Argentinian bonds which were subsequently defaulted, could enforce its judgment against assets of the Argentinian state in the United Kingdom. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 1:31 pm by Dennis Crouch
 But the molecule that does all the work, they import from the United States. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 3:00 am
Blatt, Assistant to the Solicitor General, will argue for United States   as amicus curiae supporting the petitioner for 10 minutes. [read post]