Search for: "Pike v. State" Results 181 - 200 of 265
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Dec 2007, 7:42 am
Box 48314 Olympia, WA 98504-8314 Phone: (360) 586-3558; (800) 634-4473 (V/TTY/Toll Free) Web: www.wa.gov/ddc Helping Hands for the Disabled P.O. [read post]
8 Nov 2007, 7:56 am
COLORADO STATE RESOURCES AGING Colorado Association of Homes and Services for the Aging 1888 Sherman Street, Suite 610 Denver, CO 80203-1160 Phone: (303) 837-8834 Fax: (303) 837-8836 Aging and Adult Services Department of Social Services 110 16th Street, Suite 200 Denver, CO 80203 Phone: (303) 620-4147; (800) 544-9181 (Toll Free) AARP Colorado State Office 1301 Pennsylvania Street Denver, CO 80203 Phone: (303) 830-2277 Fax: (303) 764-5999 E-mail: coaarp@aarp.org Web:… [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 3:51 pm
Besides testing the law’s impact on capital and business form, the new petition asks the Court to clarify how far states must go to prove that there are local benefits that outweigh any burden a business-regulating law imposes on commerce among the states — essentially, a plea for the Court to revisit   its most important precedent on that issue: Pike v. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 1:46 am by INFORRM
There should be some form of back stop power, vested in another body and, given that body needs sufficient powers to demand compliance, it will, regrettably have to be one regulated by the state. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 2:49 pm by John Elwood
  Baron Pikes died in police custody after being tased eight times. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 3:34 am by SHG
  Normally, this is where I would insert a quote from the decision in Rich v. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 7:09 pm by Patricia Salkin
Lamar Tennessee, LLC v City of Knoxville, 2016 WL 746503 (TN App. 2/25/2016)    Filed under: Current Caselaw, Due Process, Non-Conforming Uses, Signs, Uncategorized [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 5:23 am by Eugene Volokh
New York State Liquor Authority[15] involved a New York law under which liquor distillers could not sell to wholesalers in New York except in accordance with a monthly price schedule that affirmed that prices in New York were no higher than the lowest prices charged in other states.[16] Healy v. [read post]
16 Mar 2022, 2:35 pm by John Elwood
Ross, 21-468Issues: (1) Whether allegations that a state law has dramatic economic effects largely outside of the state and requires pervasive changes to an integrated nationwide industry state a violation of the dormant commerce clause, or whether the extraterritoriality principle described in the Supreme Court’s decisions is now a dead letter; and (2) whether such allegations, concerning a law that is based solely on preferences regarding out-of-state… [read post]