Search for: "Polk v. Polk"
Results 181 - 200
of 564
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Dec 2008, 5:10 am
blank">Polk v. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 6:57 pm
Polk Wagner, (both UPenn)[808 downloads] The Private and Social Costs of Patent Trolls, by James E. [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 3:12 pm
The Court did formally grant the petition in Insurance Corp. of Hannover v. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 6:38 am
Its unanimous en banc decision in Minn-Chem, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Mar 2022, 12:08 pm
” Polk v. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 8:58 am
(For those unfamiliar with claim construction, see Polk Wagner's introductory lecture.) [read post]
6 Jun 2008, 10:01 am
In Garten v. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 4:27 am
Southwell, Katherine Polk Failla [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 3:01 pm
And congratulations to the upstanding DPW (led by William Aaronson) and V&E (led by Jeffery Floyd and Stephen Gill) lawyers working on the deal who had nothing to do with this nonsense. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 2:47 am
" However, the documentary evidence demonstrated that the plaintiff's individual liability on the notes was a matter outside of the scope of the defendants' representation of the plaintiff in her capacity as co-executor of the estate (see CPLR 3211[a][1]; AmBase Corp. v Davis Polk & Wardwell, 8 NY3d 428, 435; DeNatale v Santangelo, 65 AD3d 1006, 1007; Turner v Irving Finkelstein & Meirowitz, LLP, 61 AD3d 849, 850). [*2]" [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 2:57 am
" However, the documentary evidence demonstrated that the plaintiff's individual liability on the notes was a matter outside of the scope of the defendants' representation of the plaintiff in her capacity as co-executor of the estate (see CPLR 3211[a][1]; AmBase Corp. v Davis Polk & Wardwell, 8 NY3d 428, 435; DeNatale v Santangelo, 65 AD3d 1006, 1007; Turner v Irving Finkelstein & Meirowitz, LLP, 61 AD3d 849, 850). [*2]" [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 3:10 am
" However, the documentary evidence demonstrated that the plaintiff's individual liability on the notes was a matter outside of the scope of the defendants' representation of the plaintiff in her capacity as co-executor of the estate (see CPLR 3211[a][1]; AmBase Corp. v Davis Polk & Wardwell, 8 NY3d 428, 435; DeNatale v Santangelo, 65 AD3d 1006, 1007; Turner v Irving Finkelstein & Meirowitz, LLP, 61 AD3d 849, 850). [*2]" [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 6:00 am
No. 10–0511 STATE OF IOWA v. [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 1:17 pm
Wyeth v. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 12:30 pm
Defendant: Roe v. [read post]
15 Dec 2017, 6:13 am
Wang (Harvard Business School), on Wednesday, December 13, 2017 Tags: Airgas v. [read post]
21 Jul 2017, 6:04 am
Pastuszenski, Goodwin Procter LLP, on Tuesday, July 18, 2017 Tags: California, Class actions, Jurisdiction, New York, PSLRA, Securities Act, Securities litigation, Shareholder suits, SLUSA, State law, Supreme Court CalPERS v. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 7:37 pm
By Jason Rantanen Although the en banc Federal Circuit raised the bar for establishing inequitable conduct in Therasense v. [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 5:42 am
Lambda Legal's website has links here for the briefs, including all the amici briefs and decisions in the case, which is known as Varnum v. [read post]
25 May 2022, 9:44 am
Supreme Court cases: Lucia v. [read post]
