Search for: "Power v. Baker" Results 181 - 200 of 1,149
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jan 2017, 12:18 pm by Rich Vetstein
This practice has been vigorously opposed by REBA which filed a successful lawsuit effectively barring the practice in REBA v. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 8:02 am
Presumably the Court is holding Baker for disposition in light of Riegel. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 4:19 am by Amy Howe
In National Journal, Sam Baker previewed next week’s oral arguments in Bank Markazi v. [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
” In short, believe what you will, because the government has no power to tell you otherwise.Yet, the Court did not at any point say that the baker had a right to discriminate against any couple. [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 4:36 pm by Blog Editorial
The Supreme Court has announced that the judgments of the following linked cases, heard 22 – 24 November 2010, will be handed down on Wednesday 13 April 2011 – Baker v Quantum Clothing Group Limited and others; Baker v Quantum Clothing Group Limited and others (Meridian Limited); and Baker v Quantum Clothing Group Limited and others (Pretty Polly Limited) . [read post]
20 Sep 2012, 9:24 am by Sheppard Mullin
By Tyler Baker and Ted Max On September 5, 2012, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit issued its long-awaited and highly anticipated decision in Christian Louboutin S.A. v. [read post]
18 Jun 2022, 1:23 pm by Benjamin Pollard
Jolynn Dellinger and Stephanie Pell argued that if Roe v. [read post]
11 May 2019, 5:36 am by Mikhaila Fogel
The Brookings Institution hosted a special event on Friday for a live taping of the Lawfare Podcast: a conversation between former FBI General Counsel Jim Baker and Benjamin Wittes about the Russia investigation. [read post]
7 Mar 2020, 7:53 am by Elliot Setzer
Circuit’s ruling in Committee on the Judiciary v. [read post]
21 Oct 2014, 7:21 pm by Lyle Denniston
Judge Perez-Gimenez focused the first part of his constitutional analysis on the Supreme Court’s summary ruling in Baker v. [read post]
23 Sep 2021, 7:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" Additionally, the Appellate Division noted reimbursing retirees for Medicare Part B premiums is not an improper gift of public funds in violation of Article VIII, §1, of the New York State Constitution," citing Baker v Board of Education, 29 AD3d 574. [read post]