Search for: "Precision Planning v. Wall" Results 181 - 200 of 221
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Sep 2023, 10:26 am by Daniel J. Gilman
Here’s the Wall Street Journal under the demure title, “U.S. v. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 8:28 am
By the end of the Obama Administration, and with its TPP model, coming at the same time as China began developing its own Marxist-Leninist version of the structuring of a global economic system, the writing was on the wall. [read post]
2 Apr 2011, 5:47 pm by INFORRM
This Bill received a Second Reading on 9 July 2010; however it was subsequently shelved after the Government announced its own plans to introduce legislation after a period of consultation. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm by renholding
This may inflict precisely the kind of societal harm the Founders adopted the First Amendment to protect against . . . . [read post]
26 Dec 2019, 9:05 pm by Alana Bevan
President Trump praised both parties for being “willing to put partisanship aside” but reaffirmed the need for walls in “pre-determined high-risk locations,” which the bill did not fund. [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 6:37 am by Mark S. Humphreys
In exchange for agreeing to the terms of the state-regulated plans, employers are shielded from workplace negligence lawsuits. [read post]
28 May 2015, 1:38 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Many times they’re projected on the walls. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 7:12 am by Berin Szoka
By Berin Szoka & Adam Thierer We learned from The Wall Street Journal yesterday that “Federal Communications Commission Chairman Julius Genachowski gets a little peeved when people suggests that he wants to regulate the Internet. [read post]
15 Oct 2011, 4:43 am by Mandelman
Apparently, the challenge was to “estimate precisely what a dollar of infrastructure spending or small-business relief would do when let loose into the economy under these unusual conditions. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 7:26 am by Steve Lubet
No ethnographer ever wants to be a cop, but, as Khan points out, it is not unethical to breach confidentiality concerning “a plan to commit a violent crime” (Khan 2018). [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 3:48 pm by Jack Goldsmith, Marty Lederman
It primarily seeks an injunction against the planned June 23 publication of Bolton’s book, “The Room Where It Happened: A White House Memoir,” and a “constructive trust” that would give the United States the right to all of Bolton’s profits from the book. [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 11:54 am by Lawson Fite
On Nov. 23—almost three weeks after Election Day, and two weeks after the press called the election in favor of the Democratic ticket—the presidential transition finally began with a letter from General Services Administrator Emily Murphy. [read post]