Search for: "Preston v. Preston" Results 181 - 200 of 451
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jun 2010, 8:17 pm
So here's an excerpt about a kooky little copyright case called Strachborneo v. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 6:47 am by tracey
Supreme Court The Health and Safety Executive v Wolverhampton City Council [2012] UKSC 34 (18 July 2012) Munir & Anor, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] UKSC 32 (18 July 2012) Alvi, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] UKSC 33 (18 July 2012) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Horn & Ors v Commercial Acceptances Ltd [2012] EWCA Civ 958 (19 July 2012) Maidment v… [read post]
15 Feb 2008, 9:11 am
Ferrer, who appears as “Judge Alex,” to file a post-argument brief in Preston v. [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 8:56 am by INFORRM
For their part, they argued that there was no question of a constitutional right to trial by jury being at issue, rather it has already been recognised that there is an emphasis against trial by jury as reiterated by Lord Bingham MR in Aitken v Preston ([1997] EMLR 415). [read post]
20 Feb 2008, 7:03 am
 In a second decision on federal preemption, in Preston v. [read post]
1 Dec 2012, 9:08 am by Jeff Vail
Preston, 276 P.3d 78, 85 (Colo. 2011). [read post]
25 Apr 2020, 7:37 am by Francis Pileggi
The Delaware Chancery Court recently ruled that municipal bond powerhouse Nuveen LLC improperly used “lies” and “threats” in a successful campaign to damage the business of much smaller rival Preston Hollow Capital LLC but it declined to enjoin the alleged wrongs because Nuveen had discontinued them in Preston Hollow Capital LLC v. [read post]
17 Jun 2008, 2:51 am
In Significant Third Circuit ruling in federal child porn case posted at Sentencing Law and Policy, we get a discussion of the ruling in US v. [read post]
2 Dec 2007, 4:00 pm
Dept. of Revenue (06-1413), Preston v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 11:53 am by INFORRM
  The Court of Appeal took the basic principles from the controversial decision in Aitken v Preston [1997] EMLR 415, 418, in which it was said that the judge (Popplewell J) had correctly identified three issues (i)  Will there be a prolonged examination of documents? [read post]