Search for: "Prior v. Commissioner of Social Security"
Results 181 - 200
of 268
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
The State actors are the State of New York, Governor of the State of New York, the New York State Board of Regents, the New York State Education Department, and the New York State Commissioner of Education (collectively the State). [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
The State actors are the State of New York, Governor of the State of New York, the New York State Board of Regents, the New York State Education Department, and the New York State Commissioner of Education (collectively the State). [read post]
22 Jul 2024, 11:26 am
If the choreographer independently creates the work without any prior contractual agreements specifying otherwise, they retain the copyright to the choreographic work. [read post]
6 Jan 2025, 9:07 am
Supreme Court’s June 2024 decision in the SEC v. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
16 Oct 2018, 3:55 pm
The record $16 million resolution payment eclipses the prior record resolution payment of $5.55 million Memorial Healthcare System (MHS) paid OCR to settle HIPAA charges in 2016. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 1:05 pm
In 2016, Swarns served as lead counsel for Buck, arguing Buck v. [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 3:01 pm
Or, as dissenting FCC Commissioner Brendan Carr observed, “the internet didn’t break. [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 8:33 pm
He has been awarded the Vespasian V. [read post]
14 May 2023, 6:56 pm
The normative focus is on development, collective prosperity and security, and on compliance with local law and localized international standards. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 2:14 pm
Commissioner, 74 Mass. [read post]
12 Aug 2024, 11:02 pm
In Consumers’ Research v. [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 9:55 am
Some social problems have been around for a long time. [read post]
25 Jan 2009, 1:17 pm
., : : PETITIONER, : ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION : v [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 4:57 pm
Decisions this Week IndiaIn Re: Banners Placed on Roadside in the City of Lucknow v. [read post]
31 Jan 2016, 9:30 pm
Bank v. [read post]
17 May 2024, 3:00 am
The case is United States v. [read post]
