Search for: "Prior v. Department of Revenue" Results 181 - 200 of 837
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
The franchise tax is imposed at a rate of $1.50 for each $1,000, or major fraction of the first $300,000 of taxable capital.[9] The legislation originally called for the suspension of the capital stock tax for all taxpayers but the revenue impact was determined to be too substantial and, ultimately, the provision was watered down prior to enactment. 2020 Louisiana Regular Session Marketplace facilitators Act 216 (S.B. 138), 2020 Reg. [read post]
30 Sep 2020, 1:55 am by Kevin Kaufman
After December 31, 2025, these provisions are scheduled to revert to prior law. [read post]
26 Sep 2020, 12:41 pm by Public Employment Law Press
 Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC): Title V Operating Permit Program Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance for the Eight Fiscal Years Ended March 31, 2017 (2020-F-13) An audit covering the period April 1, 2009 through March 31, 2017 found DEC generally had adequate procedures in place to capture the Clean Air Act program’s revenues, expenditures and changes in fund balance transaction data. [read post]
26 Sep 2020, 12:41 pm by Public Employment Law Press
 Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC): Title V Operating Permit Program Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance for the Eight Fiscal Years Ended March 31, 2017 (2020-F-13) An audit covering the period April 1, 2009 through March 31, 2017 found DEC generally had adequate procedures in place to capture the Clean Air Act program’s revenues, expenditures and changes in fund balance transaction data. [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 1:55 am by Kevin Kaufman
” When implemented, this tax was not considered an environmental measure, but rather a fiscal tool purely used to raise tax revenue.[3] Prior to the implementation of the carbon tax, most environmental measures consisted of regulations and prohibitions. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 12:32 pm by Jane Turner
Percival said the prior Director told him that “it needed to take place to meet USIS revenue goals. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 12:32 pm by Jane Turner
Percival said the prior Director told him that “it needed to take place to meet USIS revenue goals. [read post]
7 Sep 2020, 2:06 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  As a general matter, the cases tend to fall into one of three categories: (1) lawsuits against companies that experienced a COVID outbreak in one of its facilities (such as, for example, cruise ship lines and private prison systems); (2) lawsuits against companies that made public statements suggesting the companies could profit from the pandemic (such as vaccine development companies, as well as manufacturers of personal protective equipment or diagnostic tests); and (3) companies whose… [read post]
4 Sep 2020, 1:08 pm by John Ross
Fifth Circuit: It is, notwithstanding Justice Alito's suggestion in Reed v. [read post]
13 Aug 2020, 1:55 am by Kevin Kaufman
In New Hampshire, which forgoes an income tax and is home to many residents who normally work out of offices in Massachusetts, the state Department of Justice is exploring Massachusetts’ new sourcing rule with an eye to possible litigation. [read post]
6 Aug 2020, 7:36 am by Erwin Chemerinsky and Howard Gillman
Montana Department of Revenue, the court’s conservatives decided, 5-4, that “no aid to religion” provisions in state constitutions violated the federal Constitution if they led states to deny public benefits to religious institutions solely because of their religious character. [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 2:55 am by Kevin Kaufman
Taxes played an important role in many of these relocations, but clearly many of the departing companies were looking for something other than the lowest possible tax burden. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 8:10 am by Howard Iken
  Prior to filing an appeal, the petitioner received notice of intent to suspend his license from the Department of Revenue. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 3:27 am by Edith Roberts
Montana Department of Revenue, holding that Montana’s exclusion of religious schools from a state-funded scholarship program for private schools violated the First Amendment, “parents will have more options when it comes to directing their kids’ education—whether at secular or religious schools. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 7:00 am by Guest Blogger
Benjamin EidelsonThis post offers preliminary analysis of DHS v. [read post]