Search for: "Property Damage Appraisers Inc" Results 181 - 200 of 220
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Feb 2011, 9:30 pm
Dell Holdings Inc., 1997 CanLII 400 (S.C.C.), [1997] 1 S.C.R. 32, at paras. 20-22, Cory J. [read post]
4 Mar 2012, 1:47 pm by Law Lady
Appeals -- Non-final orders -- Jurisdiction -- Interlocutory order that merely gives trial court's opinion of the percentage of ownership in corporation held by three persons is not appealable under rule of appellate procedure that allows for review of non-final orders that determine the right to immediate possession of property, since the order on appeal does not order any disbursement of funds or determine any right to immediate possession of property -- Appeal dismissed for… [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 5:05 pm
The requirements of open and notorious are codified by the Florida statutes §95.16 and §95.18 where the "in your face" and "neighbors knew his place" are met by recording the title ( §95.16) or by returning a property description to the county property appraiser and paying taxes on the property ( §95.18) and by the substantial enclosure and cultivation or improvement requirements. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Despite being generally effective and causing less collateral damage to native species than matting, DASH is expensive and time consuming, resultantly limiting the number and area of removal projects that can be undertaken in a given year, while having only a temporary impact due to EWM's ability to quickly repopulate disturbed areas. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Despite being generally effective and causing less collateral damage to native species than matting, DASH is expensive and time consuming, resultantly limiting the number and area of removal projects that can be undertaken in a given year, while having only a temporary impact due to EWM's ability to quickly repopulate disturbed areas. [read post]
12 Jan 2018, 6:08 am
Jain (Towson University), and Omesh Kini (Georgia State Unviersity), on Saturday, January 6, 2018 Tags: Agency model, Behavioral finance, Capital allocation, Executive Compensation, Incentives, Management, Market efficiency, Product markets, Risk, Risk-taking, Shareholder value Damage Quantification in Delaware for Breaches of Contract in Post-Merger Litigation Posted by Arthur H. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 11:02 am by Steve Bainbridge
Technicolor, Inc., 634 A.2d 345 (Del. 1993), which held that “the measure of any recoverable loss … under an entire fairness standard of review is not necessarily limited to the difference between the price offered and the “true” value as determined under appraisal proceedings. [read post]
15 Oct 2018, 3:30 am by Matthew D. Donovan
In Jarmuth, the resident-shareholder sued the co-op and its board of directors for fiduciary breach and corporate waste when the directors decided at a board meeting to settle an underlying property-damage case against the co-op and one of the directors individually and to assume all of the co-op’s related legal fees. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 7:06 pm by Dorothy
MORGAN d/b/a SAINTS & SCHOLARS TATTOOS, Appellee. 2nd District.Insurance -- Automobile -- Appraisal -- Attorney's fees -- Where insurer demanded appraisal of stolen vehicle, and insured failed to comply with appraisal clause but filed suit prematurely, insured was not entitled to award of attorney's fees for that phase of trial court proceedings - [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 3:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
Such contribution may be in cash, property or services rendered or a promissory note or other obligation to contribute cash or property or to render services. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 12:44 pm by admin
Best Company, Inc., Moody’s Investors Service, Inc., and Standard & Poor’s Ratings Service. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 3:44 am by Peter Mahler
Several years later Chain requested that the other shareholders agree to an appraisal of the property for purposes of buying out her shares for “fair compensation. [read post]
10 Oct 2016, 3:34 am by Peter Mahler
In Matter of Markman (Exterior Delite, Inc.), 14 Misc. 3d 910 [Sup Ct Bronx County 2006], following the respondents’ election to purchase the petitioner’s shares under Section 1118, the court in part relied on the surcharge provision in holding that the Special Referee who conducted the valuation hearing erred by failing to consider the petitioner’s allegations of misappropriation of funds by the controlling shareholder, and that such… [read post]