Search for: "QUARRELS v. STATE"
Results 181 - 200
of 315
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Apr 2011, 12:10 am
Keeping erroneous accounts and not entering receipts, refusal to meet on matters of business, continued quarrelling, and such a state of animosity as precludes all reasonable hope of reconciliation and friendly co-operation, have been held sufficient to justify a dissolution: Barnabe v. [read post]
Applicability of the 2015 Arbitration Amendment Act to Arbitration Related Court Proceedings: Part I
4 Apr 2016, 4:33 am
The Supreme Court in Thyssen Stahl Union GMBH v. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 5:00 am
For the reasons why other courts disagree, we recommend reading Alm v. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 3:38 am
The court takes another shot in State v. [read post]
20 May 2008, 7:49 am
" Hard to quarrel with that. [read post]
3 Jul 2009, 2:57 pm
, cited above, § 73; and see also X v. [read post]
26 Nov 2023, 9:01 pm
”Chief Justice John Roberts’s majority opinion in Students for Fair Admissions didn’t quarrel with those claims. [read post]
21 Aug 2006, 5:56 pm
[Emphasis added.]I have no quarrel with Eichenwald's investigation or his reports, which have been detailed and, as I said, quite disturbing. [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 4:42 am
Curiously, Eugene adds an update to his post that includes this: Some states, such as Illinois, go further and identify only a limited set of circumstances that, as a matter of law, can constitute reasonable provocation — for instance, “[t]he only categories of provocation recognized by this court are substantial physical injury or substantial physical assault, mutual quarrel or combat, illegal arrest, and adultery with the offender’s spouse,” People… [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 3:19 am
Although we do not quarrel with that proposition, we believe that judicially dissolving a foreign business entity is entirely distinct from resolving a dispute over its internal affairs (see Rimawi v Atkins, 42 AD3d at 801 [distinguishing between derivative claims involving internal affairs of a foreign corporation, for which there is subject matter jurisdiction, and a dissolution claim, for which there is not]). [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 3:19 am
Although we do not quarrel with that proposition, we believe that judicially dissolving a foreign business entity is entirely distinct from resolving a dispute over its internal affairs (see Rimawi v Atkins, 42 AD3d at 801 [distinguishing between derivative claims involving internal affairs of a foreign corporation, for which there is subject matter jurisdiction, and a dissolution claim, for which there is not]). [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 3:19 am
Although we do not quarrel with that proposition, we believe that judicially dissolving a foreign business entity is entirely distinct from resolving a dispute over its internal affairs (see Rimawi v Atkins, 42 AD3d at 801 [distinguishing between derivative claims involving internal affairs of a foreign corporation, for which there is subject matter jurisdiction, and a dissolution claim, for which there is not]). [read post]
17 May 2010, 4:53 am
State v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 8:09 am
Keeping erroneous accounts, not entering receipts, refusing to meet on matters of business, continued quarrelling, and such a state of animosity as precludes all reasonable hope of reconciliation and friendly co-operation, have been held sufficient to justify dissolution: Barnabe v. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 11:00 am
Accordingly, assuming, without deciding, that Senator Skelos presently has standing to sue the Governor, we now proceed to the merits (see Matter of New York State Assn. of Criminal Defense Lawyers v Kaye, 96 NY2d 512, 516 [2001]; Babigian v Wachtler, 69 NY2d 1012, 1013 [1987]; Matter of Roman Catholic Diocese of Albany v New York State Dept. of Health, 66 NY2d 948, 951 [1985]). [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 8:52 pm
United States. [read post]
22 Aug 2006, 9:23 pm
This Response registers no real quarrel with Logan's analytic account about the scope and nature of criminal justice connectedness. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 4:47 am
Two of my pet topics — dysfunctional buy-sell agreements and application of federal court abstention doctrine in private company disputes — intersect in a decision issued last month in Ray v Raj Bedi Revocable Trust, Case No. 3:19-CV-711 DRL-MGG [N.D. [read post]
11 Sep 2020, 7:30 am
That would necessitate an overt investigative step to stop the murder, and few (we trust) would quarrel with it. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 7:37 am
So we’ve decided to take the plunge.We don’t have much quarrel with Dean Chemerinsky’s initial observation that the existing regime for preemption and prescription drug product liability litigation, fashioned by the trilogy of Wyeth v. [read post]
