Search for: "Quick v. Department of Justice"
Results 181 - 200
of 674
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Feb 2015, 6:08 am
U.S. v. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 6:28 am
In Correctional Services Corp. v. [read post]
27 Oct 2018, 5:53 am
Graver also assessed the Justice Department’s shifting rationale in a Guantanamo Bay habeas litigation. [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 8:39 am
Department of Public Health, 440 Mass. 309, 798 N. [read post]
26 Jan 2013, 4:08 pm
As Lord Justice Leveson notes, the question of the relationship between the right of reply and Article 10 was considered by the Court of Human Rights in the case of Melnychuk v Ukraine (Decision of 5 July 2005). [read post]
29 May 2012, 10:02 am
The Justice Department obtained nine extensions of Supreme Court deadlines for answering the petition. [read post]
29 Dec 2014, 1:49 am
Mintz v Pazer, Decision and Order, Index No. 502127/13 [Sup Ct, Kings County Mar. 12, 2014], in which Justice David Schmidt enforced an unusual, “quick draw” buy-sell provision in the shareholders’ agreement of a real estate holding company owned 50/50 by two families, compelling a sale to the family that gave the first notice of purchase following unsuccessful mediation of a deadlock. [read post]
7 Mar 2022, 9:57 am
” (A quick Westlaw search turned up at least 20 cases that Unicolors has brought against other clothing stores.) [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 7:54 am
Department of Justice, or that its claims were not seeking a premature adjudication in the abstract without any actual facts and circumstances relating to the employment practices at issue (State of Texas v EEOC, August 20, 2014, Cummings, S). [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 12:51 pm
Quazzo v. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 3:41 pm
The stories of women involved in the case, Dukes v. [read post]
5 Jul 2017, 2:51 am
The Court accepted the case despite appeals from the Trump Justice Department to deny the case. 4. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 10:32 am
In the interim, the Chief Justice before whom we argued (disclosure, I was counsel and did the oral argument in the first of that morning's cases, State v. [read post]
14 Apr 2019, 12:19 pm
The plaintiff’s claims were essentially policy and training claims similar to claims settled by a Consent Decree in an action by the Department of Justice. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 6:45 am
Others have noted that instead of delaying risk adjustment payments, the Department of Justice could have filed a notice of appeal and sought a stay pending appeal. [read post]
14 May 2018, 8:58 am
The Department of Justice is part of the executive branch of government; its positions are neither law (unless Congress likes and adopts its ideas) nor precedent. [read post]
19 Mar 2023, 6:30 am
As always, the Lexicon provides a quick and dirty summary with an eye to law students (especially first-year law students) with an interest in legal theory. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 2:10 pm
The Obama Administration Department of Justice failed to fight this blatant violation of the intent of Congress.On top of all that, the Obama DoJ rescinded the already long overdue regulations and announced an intent to replace them. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 6:08 am
Shibley gets in some law, such as Davis v. [read post]
11 May 2009, 10:29 am
Department of Correction v. the N.C. [read post]
