Search for: "Quick v. District of Columbia" Results 181 - 200 of 204
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jan 2010, 2:00 am
(IPKat)   United States US General November and December 2009 – quick links of all the top stories (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) (Technology & Marketing Law Blog)   US Patents If nothing else, patent attorneys will follow the semantics – machine-or-transformation standard and claim terms (ISinIP)   US Patents – Lawsuits and strategic steps Nokia - Nokia hurls new salvo in spat with Apple, complains to ITC (Ars Technica) (ITC)   US Copyright… [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 8:58 pm by smtaber
December 14, 2009 – A summary review of environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
10 Oct 2009, 8:41 pm
So far, seven states have altogether banned texting while driving: Alaska, California, Connecticut, Louisiana, Minnesota, New Jersey, and Washington, along with the District of Columbia. [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 3:12 pm
After Judge Cox's introductory remarks, Phil Cave -- speaking on behalf of the Bar Association of the District of Columbia -- made the first presentation to the commission. [read post]
12 Feb 2009, 9:19 pm
A few thoughts after a quick read: 1) The personal jurisdiction analysis as to the Mitchell Commission and Sports Illustrated claims takes a very narrow approach to Calder v. [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 9:50 am
As I'm sure you all know, in District of Columbia v. [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 3:10 pm
By Ethan Ackerman On Dec. 23, 2008, federal District Judge Maxine Chesney issued what the defense attorneys in Hoang v. [read post]
19 Nov 2008, 11:01 am
School superintendents report that that parents of children with disabilities "are too quick to threaten legal action to get their way. [read post]
16 Oct 2008, 9:22 pm
October 6, 2008), a defendant charged with various crimes relating to his purchase of a firearm while subject to an order of protection argued an "outright ban on the possession of a simple shotgun" by someone "only alleged to be the subject of an order of protection fails to pass constitutional muster" under the Supreme Court's recent right-to-bear-arms holding in District of Columbia v. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 8:26 pm
  Shortly after Section 5 was reauthorized in 2006, its constitutionality was challenged in Northwest Austin Municipal Utility District Number One v. [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 2:52 am
Baker, No. 07-219 and another one on District of Columbia v. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 8:05 am
[Federal Register: April 8, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 68)][Rules and Regulations][Page 18944-18956]From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov][DOCID:fr08ap08-3] --------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY 8 CFR Parts 214 and 274a [DHS No. [read post]
29 Feb 2008, 11:22 am
Wisconsin Right to Life, Inc., v. [read post]
26 Feb 2008, 7:40 am
The "payday" loan industry is growing rapidly and is known for its quick and easy lending.[3]  Although the quick and easy money may seem attractive, the outrageously high interest rates are leading payday loan users into an inescapable debt trap.[4] Aside from high interest rates, another critical problem surrounding the payday loan industry is its practice of targeting the elderly and other recipients of government benefits.[5]  The elderly falling… [read post]
18 Sep 2007, 5:15 am
District Court for the District of Columbia; the second was filed on June 13, 2007 in the U.S. [read post]