Search for: "ROBERT W. KAGAN" Results 181 - 200 of 399
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Sep 2017, 11:00 am by Amy Howe
A former clerk to the late Justice Antonin Scalia, Francisco served in the George W. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 10:33 am by Eugene Volokh
Roberts Jr. and joined by the other opinions plus Justice Elena Kagan. [read post]
28 Apr 2017, 6:01 am by John Duffy
The argument began with an unusual announcement by Chief Justice John Roberts, who told the lawyers for the two battling pharmaceutical firms that “the Court has decided to give each of you five extra minutes” of argument time. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 9:01 am by Ronald Mann
” On the other side of the matter, Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Elena Kagan seemed to think that significant practical considerations supported a rule that would treat the class-action complaint as adequate to protect the claims of specific investors. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 3:46 am by Edith Roberts
In The Washington Post, Robert Barnes reports that in an interview last summer Justice Elena Kagan gave Gorsuch “a face-to-face tutorial on what it means to be the Supreme Court’s newest justice”; according to Kagan, the work “starts in the kitchen,” with a high-stakes assignment to “cafeteria duty. [read post]
7 Apr 2017, 11:30 am by Mark Walsh
Before Obama, every president from Ronald Reagan to George W. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 7:34 pm by Rory Little
Justice Elena Kagan asked a single clarifying question, and it was not for some time, when Unikowsky began to discuss Section 853(p) and the forfeiture of “substitute assets,” that Chief Justice John Roberts began to question him mildly about that subsection (a subsection not at issue in this case). [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 10:55 am by Miriam Seifter
” This position, too, drew skepticism, this time from Roberts and Kennedy. [read post]
2 Mar 2017, 8:20 am by Ronald Mann
At one point, Alito asked, “[W]ould you make the same argument if it said this statute hereby supersedes and preempts any State or local law that conflicts with the terms of the contract? [read post]