Search for: "ROYAL V. STATE"
Results 181 - 200
of 2,239
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Oct 2008, 10:40 pm
Royal Bank of Canada. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 2:19 pm
What amounts to “positive action” will no doubt depend upon the circumstances of a particular case and, in some circumstances, the state may be required to take positive steps to prevent ill-treatment at the hands of others (see, e.g., R (Bagdanavicius) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2005] UKHL 38 at [24] per Lord Brown of Eaton-under-Heywood, E v Chief Constable of the Royal Ulster Constabulary [2008] UKHL 66 at [44] per Lord… [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 10:58 am
Years after Royal Globe, the California Supreme Court expressly overruled Royal Globe in Moradi–Shalal v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 10:58 am
Years after Royal Globe, the California Supreme Court expressly overruled Royal Globe in Moradi–Shalal v. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 10:55 pm
" Associated Newspapers have stated that they "categorically deny that the duchess's letter was edited in any way that changed its meaning. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 4:17 am
The Court dismissed the appeal of the Secretary of State. [read post]
25 Aug 2016, 6:34 am
Classic Liquor Importers, Ltd. v. [read post]
3 Jul 2010, 7:01 am
In Alvarez v. [read post]
25 Nov 2015, 2:16 am
She stated that the Secretary of State did not seriously consider the most cost-effective form which such an inquiry might take or the “bigger picture” in that it was in the public interest to properly inquire about events of this magnitude and the importance of setting the record straight as well as providing truth to the relatives and survivors, Harrison v UK applied. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 8:37 am
Royal Dutch Petroleum comes from Oona A. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 3:20 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Miller v R [2010] EWCA Civ 1578 (09 July 2010) IT (Sierra Leone) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] EWCA Civ 787 (09 July 2010) High Court (Administrative Court) English UK Ltd, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] EWHC 1726 (Admin) (09 July 2010) High Court (Chancery Division) Airways Aero Associations Ltd v Wycombe District Council [2010] EWHC 1654 (Ch)… [read post]
29 Mar 2015, 1:54 am
The latest is Case T 581/13 Royal County of Berkshire Polo Club v OHIM - Lifestyle Equities (Royal County of Berkshire POLO CLUB), a decision rendered last Thursday by the General Court of the European Union in another POLO-related dispute, this time involving a Community trade mark (CTM) application [it seems to this Kat that the word "polo" has the same effect on brand owners as catnip has on cats -- its appeal is irresistible]. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 8:41 am
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, a federal appeals court, ruled in the Kiobel v. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 6:47 am
Royal Dutch Petroleum and Mohamad v. [read post]
11 Aug 2017, 1:37 pm
Royal (Jurisdiction; Reservation Diminishment; Criminal Law)Window Rock Unified School District v. [read post]
11 Aug 2017, 1:37 pm
Royal (Jurisdiction; Reservation Diminishment; Criminal Law)Window Rock Unified School District v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 12:47 pm
Kiobel v. [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 6:59 am
The recent case of Royal Caribbean v. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 9:59 pm
The Royal College of Nursing & Ors, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Anor [2010] EWHC 2761 (Admin) (10 November 2010) – Read judgment The High Court has ruled that a scheme which prohibits people convicted or cautioned for certain crimes from working with children or vulnerable adults breaches human rights law. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 1:03 pm
A line of federal and state cases followed that further muddied the separate entity rule waters, culminating in a 2009 case, Koehler v. [read post]
