Search for: "Ramos-Ramos v. US" Results 181 - 200 of 444
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Apr 2020, 3:54 am by Edith Roberts
At The NCSL Blog, Lisa Soronen discusses Monday’s decision in Ramos v. [read post]
2 Nov 2014, 5:13 pm by Joey Fishkin
 (I’m just using the number here that Judge Gonzalez Ramos found most credible in Texas; perhaps the real figure is higher or lower but that’s probably in the right ballpark.) [read post]
16 Jul 2008, 8:59 am
José Ernesto Medellín Rojas, César Roberto Fierro Reyna, Rubén Ramírez Cárdenas, Humberto Leal García, and RobertoMoreno Ramos are not executed pending judgment on the Request forinterpretation submitted by the United Mexican States, unless anduntil these five Mexican nationals receive review and… [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 4:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
  Justice Ramos's December 2008 decision denied the motion, holding that under the First Department's decision in Littman v. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 6:16 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Court of Appeals reverses and this case will go to trial along with the sexual and racial harassment claims that the Court of Appeals also revived, as discussed here.The case is Zeng v. [read post]
29 Sep 2013, 5:53 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
They even have the right to give the Quran to a prison guard.The case is Washington v. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 4:07 am by Edith Roberts
Yesterday’s third argument was in Ramos v. [read post]
10 Mar 2016, 8:58 am by Jon Sands
[Ed. note: This case was handled by the Arizona FPD.]United States v. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 11:15 am by Adam Feldman
Click-To-Call Technologies Sotomayor and Gorsuch dissented together, and in Ramos v. [read post]
17 Jul 2008, 5:51 pm
Avena, Take Two Following the Medellín v. [read post]
2 Jun 2009, 3:57 am
Ramos, No. 99,544 (Jan. 16, 2009); Shawna Miller (now Jackson County CA); affirming Judge Ireland's suppression order based on improper car stop.State v. [read post]
4 May 2020, 9:12 am by Amy Howe
On April 20, the justices issued their decision in Ramos v. [read post]