Search for: "Reed v. High" Results 181 - 200 of 663
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Sep 2007, 9:39 am
See the following cases for interesting discussions on the enforceability of prenuptial contracts: Reed v Reed, 265 Mich App 131 (2005), and  to read an informative unpublished case in which the prenup was not enforced, see Trudeau-Chene v Trudeau, (October 26, 2006) Docket No. 260734. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 3:58 pm
Originally called Sun Microsystems Inc v M-Tech Data Ltd and another (noted by the IPKat here), the case of Oracle America Inc (formerly Sun Microsystems Inc) v M-Tech Data Ltd and Lichtenstein was marked out by the IPKat as a thunderously bad decision when the Court of Appeal reversed the decision of Kitchin J at [2010] EWCA Civ 997. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 2:11 am by Laura Sandwell, Matrix Chambers.
The appeals from the High Court of Justiciary (Scotland) concern warrants issued by the US District Court in Arizona for the extradition of the parents of six children on charges of conspiracy and importation into the United States of chemicals used to manufacture methamphetamine. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 1:52 am by Laura Sandwell
He sought assistance with ending his own life, but died of pneumonia a week after losing his case in the High Court. [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 4:00 am by Blog  Editorial
   Telchadder v Wickland Holdings Limited [2012] EWCA Civ 635 - granted on 24 July 2013 by Lady Hale, Lord Sumption and Lord Reed. [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 12:42 am by Kevin LaCroix
  Whether guidance emanates from the SEC staff or from the SEC itself, it should be taken with the same high level of significance and attentiveness. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 4:09 am by Charles Sartain
Gray Reed attorneys, led by Jim Ormiston, represented Plains. [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 1:50 am
In a rare move, Reed Smith filed a brief on its own behalf — and for two of its clients — telling the Supreme Court how crucial the case of Textron v. [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 2:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
This appeal considered whether the Respondent erred in law in refusing to refer the appellant’s case to the High Court. [read post]
10 Oct 2022, 6:00 pm by Daniel Jin
  [1] BTI 2014 LLC v Sequana SA [2022] UKSC 25. [2] Companies Act 2006, section 172. [3] Companies Act 2006, section 172(3). [4] BTI 2014 LLC v Sequana SA [2019] EWCA Civ 112. [5] BTI 2014 LLC v Sequana SA [2022] UKSC 25 [7] (Reed LJ). [6] Companies Act 2006, Part 23. [7] https://www.supremecourt.uk/press-summary/uksc-2019-0046.html [8] https://www.supremecourt.uk/press-summary/uksc-2019-0046.html [9] (n 4). [10] BTI 2014 LLC v Sequana SA [2022]… [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 3:53 am by Edith Roberts
Yesterday the court heard argument in Comcast v. [read post]