Search for: "Regina"
Results 181 - 200
of 1,755
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jan 2010, 1:51 am
Regina (Birmingham City Council) v Birmingham Crown Court, RR, interested party; Regina (South Gloucestershire District Council) v Bristol Crown Court, AW and NW, interested parties Queen’s Bench Divisional Court “When considering the grant of an application without notice to extend the time for appealing against an anti-social behaviour order under section 4(1) of the Crime and Disorder Act 1998 and rule 7(5) of the Crown Court Rules (SI 1982 No 1109) the judge could… [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 1:24 am
Regina v Blythe Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) “Offences of engaging in sexual activity in the presence of a child or causing a child to watch a sexual act were not serious specified sexual offences for the purposes of the provisions relating to dangerous offenders if the defendant was under 18. [read post]
8 May 2008, 1:37 am
Regina v Ibrahim and Others Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) “Evidence obtained during safety interviews held with a defendant in the absence of his solicitor was admissible at his subsequent trial subject to the ordinary principles governing a fair trial and excluding unfair evidence. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 1:44 am
Regina v Vasili [2011] WLR (D) 58 “If an object had all the characteristics of a flick knife, it would therefore be considered an offensive weapon per se: the fact that the same object functioned also as a lighter did not stop it being an offensive weapon. [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 9:55 am
Regina v Kelleher Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) “A custodial sentence could be appropriate for an offence of commercial flytipping even where aggravating features, such as depositing waste of a dangerous or offensive nature, were not present. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 1:45 am
Regina v Plant Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) “Where a summary offence was tried with an indictable offence in the crown court but there was no case to answer on the indictable offence, the summary offence did not have to be withdrawn from the jury and retried before justices. [read post]
20 Oct 2008, 9:17 am
Regina v Lavery Court of Appeal “There was no reason in principle why an offence taken into consideration, which was more serious than the offence charged, should not result in a higher sentence than would otherwise have been the case. [read post]
30 May 2007, 2:47 am
Elements of kidnapping were not made out Regina v. [read post]
26 Nov 2008, 10:13 am
Regina v Doody Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) “Where a defendant raised delay to undermine the credibility of a complainant in a rape case, an appropriate warning to the jury was necessary to ensure fairness to the complainant. [read post]
21 Aug 2008, 8:47 am
Regina v Norman Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) “Once it was clear that there was an issue as to unfitness to plead, it was necessary to ensure very careful case management so that full information was provided to the court without delay. [read post]
16 May 2008, 1:56 am
Regina v Nguyen Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) “Where the Crown chose to rely on relevant bad character evidence which it had decided not to make the subject of a criminal charge, that could not have such an adverse effect on the fairness of the proceedings that the court ought not to admit such evidence. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 2:07 am
Regina v Kehoe Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) “Sentences of life imprisonment under section 225 of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 should be reserved for cases where the culpability of the offender was particularly high or the offence particularly grave. [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 1:28 am
Regina v Marchese Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) “The fact that a count in an indictment was duplicitous would not lead to the quashing of a conviction if, on the facts, the duplicity had not caused any injustice to the defendant. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 2:29 am
Regina (Huitson) v Revenue and Customs Commissioners [2011] EWCA Civ 893 ; [2011] WLR (D) 248 “Section 58 of the Finance Act 2008 which amended fiscal legislation regarding double taxation relief with retrospective effect, thereby removing tax relief from tax avoidance schemes to United Kingdom residents, was neither disproportionate nor incompatible with article 1 of the First Protocol to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental… [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 2:44 am
Regina v Sumal & Sons (Properties) Ltd: [2012] EWCA Crim 1840; [2012] WLR (D) 247 “A landlord who committed an offence of managing an unlicensed house, contrary to section 95(1) of the Housing Act 2004, did not ‘obtain’ property ‘as a result of or in connection with’ his criminal conduct, for the purposes of section 76(4) of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002, by the receipt of rent. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 2:19 am
Regina (T) v Merton London Borough Council: [2012] EWHC 2055 (Admin); [2012] WLR (D) 256 “Paragraph 65 of the Special Guardianship Guidance required a local authority to consider the National Fostering Network’s minimum allowances paid in relation to foster carers and to use them as a starting point when determining the level of financial support payable to a person acting in the capacity of a special guardian pursuant to the provisions of section 14F of the… [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 1:57 am
Regina v Hamer [2010] WLR (D) 235 “A fixed penalty notice which had been issued to a defendant pursuant to s 2 of the Criminal Justice and Police Act 2001 was not a conviction, admission of guilt, proof that a crime had been committed, or a stain on the defendant’s character, and therefore could not be regarded as evidence which impugned the character of the defendant or admitted as such. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 2:47 am
Regina v Dunn [2010] EWCA Crim 1823; [2010] WLR (D) 207 “The fact that an appeal from the Court of Appeal, Criminal Division only lay to the Supreme Court if the Court of Appeal certified that a point of law of general public importance was involved in its decision did not amount to a denial of the essence of an appellant’s right of access to the Supreme Court and was not incompatible with articles 6 and 14 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental… [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 2:16 am
Regina v Lancaster [2010] EWCA Crim 370; [2010] WLR (D) 63 “Where a person was charged with an offence of falsifying a document made or required for an accounting purpose, by omitting a material particular from that document, contrary to s 17 of the Theft Act 1968, the omitted particular was to be regarded as material if it had the effect that the document was liable to mislead in a way which was significant, or in a way which mattered. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 2:20 am
Regina v Rollins [2010] UKSC 39; [2010] WLR (D) 210 “The power of the Financial Services Authority to institute criminal proceedings was not limited to the offences referred to in ss 401 and 402 of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000; in particular the FSA had power to prosecute offences of money laundering under ss 327 and 328 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002. [read post]
