Search for: "Reining v. United States" Results 181 - 200 of 593
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jun 2015, 1:45 pm
Our long-term goals are ambitious—the end of overbroad surveillance of all digital communications, a recognition of the privacy rights of people outside the United States, and strong accountability and oversight for surveillance practices. [read post]
22 Feb 2022, 9:16 am by David M. Driesen
Since the United States is a democratic country, one might say that the nation remains secure as long as threats to the People’s sovereignty over the United States remain at bay. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 9:46 am
Here’s the abstract of Reining in the Purcell Principle: About a month before the 2014 election, the United States Supreme Court issued a series of four extraordinary orders in election law cases. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 3:52 pm by Kurt Opsahl and Rainey Reitman
  Right now, the United States Congress is facing a fundamental decision about how it will handle mass surveillance confirmed by the Snowden disclosures. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm by Julia Englebert
Despite significant federal investment in reducing emissions across most sectors, regulators and policymakers in the United States continue to exempt agricultural enterprises from much compulsory oversight. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 11:14 am by David Ingram
It would also override the Supreme Court’s 1999 ruling in United States v. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 9:09 am by Phil
The American Bar Association Section of Intellectual Property Law and the ABA Center for Continuing Legal Education are sponsoring the above-titled live webinar on Tuesday, February 14, 2012: The framework for determining a reasonable royalty was established nearly a century ago in United States Frumentum Co. v. [read post]
12 May 2015, 12:25 pm by Ars Staff
The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit has determined in American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) v. [read post]
6 Jun 2022, 9:01 am by Ronald Mann
ShareThe justices took the easy and simple path in Siegel v. [read post]
11 Nov 2015, 9:59 am
Marco Sassòli, The Convergence of the International Humanitarian Law of Non-International and International Armed Conflicts – The Dark Side of a Good Idea Urs Saxer, Staaten als Grundeinheiten des internationalen Systems Edzard Schmidt-Jortzig, Politik und Ethik Paul Seger, Let the Sunshine In: Five Small States on a Mission to a More Transparent United Nations Security Council Bruno Simma, »Ja, aber«: Der International Gerichtshof und das zwingende… [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 7:53 am by Jeff Gamso
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.I'm back to the Second Amendment because of this comment, because I find my own views on the Second Amendment so at odds with how I see the world, and because, frankly, I haven't figured out just what I want to say about Judge Bolton's order in United States v. [read post]
12 Jun 2018, 4:06 am by Edith Roberts
United States by an equally divided court. [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 4:03 am by Edith Roberts
At Top of the Ninth, Merle Kahn breaks down Tuesday’s oral argument in United States v. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 1:20 am by Kevin LaCroix
Supreme Court issued its unanimous decision in Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]