Search for: "Robert Duke"
Results 181 - 200
of 1,325
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jul 2020, 10:26 pm
Roberts. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 12:42 pm
, 30 Duke Envtl. [read post]
19 Jul 2020, 9:07 pm
After all, the Duke memo was based on a U.S. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 4:11 am
At the Second Thoughts Blog from the Duke Center for Firearms Law, Daniel Rice examines the court’s “void for vagueness” doctrine and how it might relate to the Second Amendment, drawing on Justice Clarence Thomas’ concurrence in United States v. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 7:58 am
The next day, Duke acted on that advice. [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 9:05 pm
In a recent opinion authored by Chief Justice John Roberts, the U.S. [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 3:38 am
Barrett points out the influence of Professor Robert Cushman on Justice Elena Kagan’s dissenting opinion in Seila Law v. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 3:42 am
” At the Duke Center for Firearms Law’s Second Thoughts blog, Jake Charles discusses the implications of Chief Justice John Roberts’ concurring opinion in June Medical for “the fight over Second Amendment methodology. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 12:59 pm
Calhoun or Robert E. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 7:00 am
That proposition is neither novel nor demanding; as Chief Justice Roberts points out, it was the central holding of State Farm. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 8:56 am
I think the crass answer is that Chief Justice Roberts would have found something, anything, to nitpick. [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 3:52 am
” Nina Totenberg reports at NPR that “[t]here is much more to come from the court in the coming weeks, but Chief Justice Roberts is clearly putting his stamp on the term so far. [read post]
20 Jun 2020, 2:29 pm
" Then Roberts interjected: Chief Justice Roberts: But, Mr. [read post]
19 Jun 2020, 7:00 am
Support for the production of this series was provided by the Versatile Humanists at Duke program. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 11:03 pm
Second, Chief Justice Roberts limited his review to the Duke memorandum, and disregards the Nielsen memorandum. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 9:05 pm
Duke violated the Administrative Procedure Act by rescinding the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program on the sole basis that she considered it to be an unlawful extension of the U.S. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 2:12 pm
According to Roberts, in 2017, then-Acting Secretary of Homeland Security Duke should have analyzed the legality of DACA's benefits and forbearance prongs separately. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 12:45 pm
Robert’s opinion is worth a read. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 11:39 am
In sum, Acting Secretary Duke did not provide a sufficient justification to rescind the program in violation of the APA. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 11:03 am
” Former acting Secretary of Homeland Security, Elaine Duke, said the program would be phased out. [read post]
