Search for: "Roberts v. United States, et al." Results 181 - 200 of 787
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Apr 2019, 6:21 am by Matthew Scott Johnson
Robert Sherwin’s article Ambiguity in Anti-SLAPP Law and Frivolous Litigation is cited in the following article: George Wyeth et al., The Impact of Citizen Environmental Science in the United States, 49 ELR 10237 (2019). 5. [read post]
23 Feb 2019, 3:51 pm by Marty Lederman
"Justice Thomas's mantra of fidelity to "original meaning" appears to be an effort to portray himself as a practitioner of the “New Originalism,” a school of thought that (in theory) has abandoned the old-fashioned, discredited “old originalism” ideas (associated with Robert Bork, et al.) that the Constitution should be interpreted according to the Framers’ intentions or expectations in favor of… [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 6:28 am
Stone, et al., Constitutional Law (Aspen Law & Business, 4th ed., 2001): 331-419. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 3:03 am by Ben
Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit in Folkens v Wyland. [read post]
28 Oct 2018, 6:07 pm by Steven Cohen
Tyler et alUnited States District Court – Northern District of Mississippi – October 22nd, 2018) involves an incident that occurred at a casino in Tunica Resorts, Mississippi. [read post]
24 Oct 2018, 4:33 pm by Kevin LaCroix
John Reed Stark Most readers are undoubtedly familiar with the concept of “insider trading” – that is, the purchase or sale by company insiders of their personal holdings in company shares based on material non-public information. [read post]
6 Oct 2018, 11:34 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
District Court Judge Reed O’Connor in the Northern District of Texas declared the federal Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA) unconstitutional in an opinion in Brackeen et. al. v. [read post]
30 Sep 2018, 6:28 pm by Georgialee Lang
They also noted that the National Alliance is a lawful corporation in good standing and had no criminal convictions either in Canada or the United States. [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
As some observers have suggested, for example, Roberts et al. might continue to issue rulings that amount to reversals of precedent without calling them reversals.The most widely discussed example of this would be for the Court not to overrule Roe explicitly (because that would energize even some otherwise conservative voters) but instead to decide that there simply are no abortion restrictions that constitute an “undue burden. [read post]