Search for: "Rowe v. State" Results 181 - 200 of 3,267
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jun 2007, 12:09 pm
District Court Judge Gregory Frost allowed the inclusion of six more death row inmates to the pending Cooey v. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 6:53 am by Dominic Yobbi
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website] ruled [opinion, PDF] 5-4 Thursday in Brumfield v. [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 8:46 pm
" The Supreme Court has agreed to decide whether poor death row inmates seeking mercy from state officials have a right to lawyers paid for by federal taxpayers. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 1:54 pm by Dwight Sullivan
CAAF yesterday denied military death row inmate Ronald Gray’s writ appeal, appearing to set the stage for his habeas litigation to resume in the United States District Court for the District of Kansas: Misc. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 9:18 am by Steve Hall
The responsibility of the state to provide exculpatory evidence to the defense was articulated in the 1963 Supreme Court ruling in Brady v. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 8:53 am by Steve Hall
  The agreed settlement in Texas Board of Examiners of Psychologists v. [read post]
4 Sep 2007, 6:35 am
De LaRosa's semantic alchemy defies the criteria for gang activity as defined inthe CDCR rules and regulations, as well as the standard set forth in the1994 case Castillo v. [read post]
In a press release Governor Brown stated: Unlike previous commutations I’ve granted to individuals who have demonstrated extraordinary growth and rehabilitation, this commutation is not based on any rehabilitative efforts by the individuals on death row. [read post]
9 Oct 2007, 10:14 am
Here is an excerpt dealing with capital cases:The Court, in other action on Tuesday, refused to give states new guidance on how a death-row inmate is to be judged mentally retarded and thus not subject to the death penalty. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 3:57 am
State law claims survive ADA claim dismissalGiordano v City of New York, CA2, 274 F.3d 740The Giordano case illustrates the fact that sometimes it is possible to maintain a discrimination lawsuit under state law notwithstanding the fact that the federal courts have dismissed similar claims alleging violations of federal law.In such situations the state courts should make the determination based on state law and not consider the action taken by the federal… [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 4:30 am by Jim Dedman
I think the New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division decision in Kendall v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 11:16 am by Donna Eng
McNeil, 08-14402-CIV-JEM, concluding that Florida’s death penalty procedure violates the United States Supreme Court case of Ring v. [read post]