Search for: "S. v. D."
Results 181 - 200
of 68,661
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jun 2009, 1:31 am
R v Fazal [2009] WLR (D) 175 “A defendant who allowed another person to lodge, receive, retain or withdraw money which amounted to criminal property from the defendant's bank account, was to be regarded as having converted that property for the purposes of s 327(1)(c) of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 3:35 am
R v Ghulam; [2009] WLR (D) 303 “The word ‘determination’ in s 4(6) of the Criminal Procedure (Insanity) Act 1964 refers only to a determination that a defendant is unfit to plead so that, where that provision's requirement for evidence from two or more registered medical practitioners to be before the court has not been met, [...] [read post]
21 Sep 2016, 6:46 am
" TriDim Innovations LLC v. [read post]
22 May 2017, 4:41 pm
S. 250, 258 (2006); see Rehberg v. [read post]
11 Jun 2020, 9:00 pm
Elaborés à partir de procédés à la pointe de l’innovation (biotechnologies, culture de cellules végétales, chimie fine, synthèse peptidique, extraction végétale…), les produits Sederma sont distribués sur [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 7:09 am
In TriPacific Capital Advisors, LLC v. [read post]
15 Oct 2019, 6:07 am
Clinton D. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 3:24 am
Enviroco Ltd v Farstad Supply A/S [2011] UKSC 16; [2011] WLR (D) 126 “When a Scottish holding company’s entire shareholding in one of its subsidiary companies had been pledged to a Scottish creditor as security and, pursuant to Scots law, the creditor had become the registered shareholder, the subsidiary company was, for the purposes of section 736 of the Companies Act 1985, no longer a subsidiary of the holding company. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 9:33 am
Ewing v Director of Public Prosecutions; [2008] WLR (D) 276; [2008] WLR (D) 276 “It was necessary for a person who was the subject of a civil proceedings order to seek leave, under s 42(3) of the Supreme Court Act 1981, to make an application for permission to proceed with a claim for judicial review notwithstanding that the underlying decision he sought to challenge related to a criminal cause or matter. [read post]
27 Dec 2023, 4:17 pm
Mohammed, No. 22-3072, Mohammed’s third trip to the D. [read post]
20 Jul 2016, 1:48 pm
Supp.3d 654, 661 (D. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 4:23 am
App. 1975), aff'd, Andresen v. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 2:26 am
Regina v Webster [2010] EWCA Crim 2819; [2010] WLR (D) 216 “The reverse onus of proof which s 2 of the Prevention of Corruption Act 1916 effected on a prosecution for an offence contrary to s 1(2) of the Public Bodies Corrupt Practices Act 1889, placing on the defendant the legal burden of disproving guilt was no longer necessary and the means of imposition were unreasonable and disproportionate, and so it unjustifiably interfered with the presumption of… [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 2:22 am
Regina v Brewster [2010] EWCA Crim 1194; [2010] WLR (D) 159 “Where a party sought to admit evidence of a witness’s bad character which bore only indirectly on his credibility, and that credibility was a matter in issue in the proceedings and of substantial importance in the context of the case as a whole, such evidence was only admissible pursuant to s 100(1)(b) of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 as evidence of substantial probative value on the… [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 4:26 am
In State v. [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 2:09 am
Child Support Agency v Truman; [2009] WLR (D) 40 “The test for the correct comparator in cases of disability-related discrimination in the employment field under s 3A of the Disability Discrimination Act 1995, was the same as that applied to the housing provisions of the Act by the House of Lords in Lewisham London Borough Council [...] [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 2:55 pm
This editorial about the Wal-Mart v. [read post]
11 Feb 2009, 2:22 am
Managa Properties Ltd v Brittain [2009] EWHC 157 (Ch); [2009] WLR (D) 42 “Where an application was made under s 172(3) of the Insolvency Act 1986 for an order directing the liquidator to call a creditors' meeting for the purpose of seeking to replace the liquidator, the applicant had to show that it was in the [...] [read post]
29 Jul 2008, 8:36 am
Mosley v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2008] EWHC 1777 (QB); [2008] WLR (D); [2008] WLR (D) 259 “Sado-masochistic behaviour, even where it involved adultery, was not a matter of genuine public interest justifying interference by the media in an individual's private life. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 2:25 am
R (BA (Nigeria)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; R (PE (Cameroon)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2009] EWCA Civ 119; [2009] WLR (D) 77 “A right of appeal against the Home Office's refusal to revoke a deportation order was exercisable from within the United Kingdom. [read post]
