Search for: "SCOTT v. PENNSYLVANIA"
Results 181 - 200
of 726
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Sep 2019, 12:00 pm
Pennsylvania (1842) Dred Scott v. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 12:15 pm
Sept. 16, 2019 Brown, J.), the court addressed the application of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court’s decision in Gallagher v. [read post]
27 Aug 2019, 5:00 am
In the case of Baez v. [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 6:30 am
Civil WarKalyani Ramnath, Harvard University (kalyaniramnath@fas.harvard.edu) Boats in a Storm: Law and Displacement in Postwar South AsiaEvan Taparata, University of Pennsylvania (taparata@sas.upenn.edu) State of Refuge: Refugee Law and the Modern United StatesAdnan Zulfiqar, Rutgers Law School (adnan.zulfiqar@rutgers.edu) Collective Duties in Islamic Law: The Moral Community, State Authority, and Ethical Speculation in the late 9th to the 14th Centuries CEConvener: Reuel… [read post]
21 Aug 2019, 1:09 pm
Civil WarKalyani Ramnath, Harvard University (kalyaniramnath@fas.harvard.edu)Boats in a Storm: Law and Displacement in Postwar South AsiaEvan Taparata, University of Pennsylvania (taparata@sas.upenn.edu)State of Refuge: Refugee Law and the Modern United StatesAdnan Zulfiqar, Rutgers Law School (adnan.zulfiqar@rutgers.edu)Collective Duties in Islamic Law: The Moral Community, State Authority, and Ethical Speculation in the late 9th to the 14th Centuries CE8:30… [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 9:58 pm
Township of Scott, Pennsylvania, ___ U.S. ___, 139 S.Ct. 2162, 204 L.Ed.2d 558 (2019), did not change that ripeness rule. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 5:00 am
The Court ruled that this is so even if the benefits are paid out of a Trust.In so ruling, the Commonwealth Court followed the Pennsylvania Supreme Court's decision in the case of Pennsylvania State Police v. [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 4:02 am
At The Daily Signal, David Breemer explains why the Supreme Court was right to overrule precedent in Knick v. [read post]
26 Jul 2019, 3:47 am
Township of Scott, Pennsylvania, in which the justices overruled a precedent that required property owners to follow state compensation procedures before bringing federal takings claim under the Constitution, “is a game-changer and will likely bring about a revolution in takings litigation. [read post]
24 Jul 2019, 8:16 am
Township of Scott, Pennsylvania and Virginia Uranium v. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 10:31 am
In Knick, the Township of Scott, Pennsylvania passed an ordinance requiring that “[a]ll cemeteries … be kept open and accessible to the general public during daylight hours”. [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 9:00 am
Township of Scott, Pennsylvania, 139 S.Ct. 2162 (2019). [read post]
17 Jul 2019, 4:04 am
Township of Scott, Pennsylvania, in which the justices overruled precedent that required property owners to follow state compensation procedures before bringing federal takings claim under the Constitution. [read post]
11 Jul 2019, 8:00 am
Supreme Court’s decision in South Dakota v. [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 4:42 am
That claim was denied by the carrier on September 19, 2014 under an application of the Household Exclusion in the policy.Fast forward to January 23, 2019 at which point the Pennsylvania Supreme Court issued its Gallagher v. [read post]
Gallagher v. GEICO Household Exclusion Decision Extended Yet Again by Eastern District Federal Court
3 Jul 2019, 5:00 am
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court’s monumental decision in Gallagher v. [read post]
3 Jul 2019, 2:00 am
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court's January 2019 decision in the case of Gallagher v. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 4:17 am
Township of Scott, Pennsylvania, the justices overruled a precedent that required property owners to follow state compensation procedures before bringing federal takings claim under the Constitution, arguing that the decision “will have implications stretching far beyond Knick’s farm in Pennsylvania, giving property owners nationwide a fighting chance to challenge government overreach and abuse. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 1:55 pm
Township of Scott. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 9:51 am
Township of Scott, Pennsylvania, 588 U.S. ___ (2019), the court majority (consisting of Roberts, Alito, Gorsuch, Thomas and Kavanaugh) ruled that property owners may bring Fifth Amendment claims for compensation as soon as their property has been taken, “regardless of any post-taking remedies that may be available to the property owner,” citing Jacobs v. [read post]
