Search for: "SEALED APPELLANT 1"
Results 181 - 200
of 679
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Sep 2019, 8:29 pm
The Act addresses this by providing an explicit definition of “journalist” in s. 39.1(1) of the Canada Evidence Act, and therefore identifies the parties it intends to provide protections for, journalist means a person whose main occupation is to contribute directly, either regularly or occasionally, for consideration, to the collection, writing or production of information for dissemination by the media, or anyone who assists such a person. [read post]
20 Sep 2019, 9:56 am
R. 28(d)(1). [read post]
22 Aug 2019, 5:01 am
Bonner had filed, in order to oppose his attempt to seal any court order the court would issue in that case. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 7:26 am
Over objection, President Clinton’s secret service guards were ordered to testify before the grand jury during the Lewinsky scandal (In re Sealed Case, 1998), but presidents have nonetheless continued to rely on the discretion of the Secret Service. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 5:03 am
" 1. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 3:30 am
” However, the district court never made such a determination, nor, said the Second Circuit, did it "discern any basis for permitting to proceed under a pseudonym,"* and directed the Clerk of Court is directed to amend the caption to read as follows:Kathleen Howard, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. [read post]
5 Jul 2019, 3:03 am
Karimian v Karlin 2019 NY Slip Op 05193 Decided on June 27, 2019 Appellate Division, First Department is a good example. [read post]
5 Jul 2019, 3:03 am
Karimian v Karlin 2019 NY Slip Op 05193 Decided on June 27, 2019 Appellate Division, First Department is a good example. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 5:02 pm
This scenario is governed by Minnesota Statute Section 152.025, subdivision 1(1). [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 5:02 pm
This scenario is governed by Minnesota Statute Section 152.025, subdivision 1(1). [read post]
16 Jun 2019, 11:07 am
| Conversant v LG: No FRAND rate in sight, as the Paris Cour d'appel tackles essentiality and German trade secrets | Does a “Launch At Risk” Automatically Exclude the Right to Appropriate Compensation for a Wrongfully-Issued Preliminary Injunction? [read post]
13 Jun 2019, 1:06 pm
| Conversant v LG: No FRAND rate in sight, as the Paris Cour d'appel tackles essentiality and German trade secrets | Does a “Launch At Risk” Automatically Exclude the Right to Appropriate Compensation for a Wrongfully-Issued Preliminary Injunction? [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 4:00 am
The Administrative Law Judge found, upon the hearing, that a preponderance of the evidence showed that the petitioner committed a category three act of neglect (see Social Services Law §§493[3][a][i]; [4][c]; 494[1][a]; 14 NYCRR 624.5[j][1][i]; 700.4-700.5). [read post]
12 May 2019, 4:00 am
Cooper, [1993] 1 S.C.R. 146, at p. 159). [read post]
11 May 2019, 11:47 am
But even on the matter of fee proof, appellate dispositions are inconsistent in credit card cases. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 1:13 am
The appellants contest this interpretation of Rule 6. [read post]
6 Apr 2019, 9:29 am
District Court for the District of Columbia to disclose sealed grand jury records relating to the Watergate investigation to the House Judiciary Committee outside of the strict bounds of Rule 6(e). [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 6:50 am
., [2017] 1 SCR 82, arose from a lower court decision that ordered Google to block websites that were selling goods that violated the trade secrets of the plaintiffs. [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 10:39 am
Claimant ID 100246928: Claimant ID 100246928—a/k/a the Tampa Bay Buccaneers—asks this court to seal the courtroom where the team will argue its appeal on April 1. [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 10:39 am
Claimant ID 100246928: Claimant ID 100246928—a/k/a the Tampa Bay Buccaneers—asks this court to seal the courtroom where the team will argue its appeal on April 1. [read post]
