Search for: "SEC v. Lewis"
Results 181 - 200
of 269
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Feb 2007, 5:25 am
Bur., Inc. v. [read post]
24 Dec 2014, 3:01 pm
” Lewis v. [read post]
29 Aug 2023, 7:33 am
My favorite thread in the book is its discussion of the effect of Justice Lewis Powell on the Supreme Court’s approach to securities law. [read post]
13 Jan 2017, 12:10 pm
SEC: Whether the five-year statute of limitations in a general provision governing penalties and forfeitures applies to claims by the SEC seeking disgorgement of illegally obtained profits. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 10:10 am
Sec. 7 comment c (1958). [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 5:56 pm
" (NSBA v. [read post]
Supreme Court Holds That PAGA Representative Waivers Are Enforceable In Certain Significant Respects
16 Jun 2022, 9:45 am
Lewis, 138 S. [read post]
17 Feb 2021, 8:41 am
Disclaimer: This Blog/Web Site is made available by the law firm of Liskow & Lewis, APLC (“Liskow & Lewis”) and the individual Liskow & Lewis lawyers posting to this site for educational purposes and to give you general information and a general understanding of the law only, not to provide specific legal advice as to an identified problem or issue. [read post]
17 Feb 2021, 8:41 am
Disclaimer: This Blog/Web Site is made available by the law firm of Liskow & Lewis, APLC (“Liskow & Lewis”) and the individual Liskow & Lewis lawyers posting to this site for educational purposes and to give you general information and a general understanding of the law only, not to provide specific legal advice as to an identified problem or issue. [read post]
29 Jul 2009, 9:20 am
Syst. v. [read post]
1 Aug 2009, 9:20 am
Syst. v. [read post]
9 Jun 2019, 11:27 am
US v Hudson 1812 correctly decided that the Constitution did not authorize Congress to define and punish common law crimes. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 12:19 pm
Why You Should Fight Lawsuits by Debt Buying Companies - by John Skiba15 Symptoms that a Plan Sponsor's Retirement Plan might be "Ill" - by The Rosenbaum Law Firm P.C.US v. [read post]
4 Sep 2009, 11:34 am
Tom Ulen has a nice discussion of this in a short article at 10 Lewis & Clark L. [read post]
4 Dec 2020, 6:15 am
Wahlquist, Sabastian V. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 12:01 pm
Tomko , No. 05-4997 Sentence for tax evasion is confirmed where: 1) the the district court did not commit procedural error at sentencing, as the record shows the district court did not fail to meaningfully consider the 18 U.S.C. sec. 3553(a) factor of general deterrence; and 2) the court did not abuse its discretion in sentencing defendant, as the court conducted a thorough analysis of the sec. 3553(a) factors and gave logical reasons for the variance from the sentencing guidelines… [read post]
19 Jul 2020, 7:17 am
Vasquez, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 12:44 pm
Supplemental bonding: Current regulations – BOEM can require additional security based on an evaluation of ability to carry out present and future obligations demonstrated by five factors: (i) financial capacity substantially in excess of existing and anticipated lease and other obligations as evidenced by audited financial statements; (ii) projected financial strength significantly in excess of existing and future lease obligations based on the estimated value of existing OCS lease production… [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 3:44 pm
” (INA Sec. 101(a)(15)(L)) This is echoed in part of the regulations at 8 CFR Sec. 214.2(l)(1)(ii)(A). [read post]
17 Feb 2017, 12:21 pm
Lewis (granted and consolidated with two other cases, Ernst & Young LLP v. [read post]
