Search for: "SECTION 13 OFFICER"
Results 181 - 200
of 7,688
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Feb 2024, 7:28 am
December 13, 2023, Chesapeake GDC 85/60 RD, reduced to speeding at 9 over. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm
Today’s final rules concern the Commissions’ joint sections on Form PF. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 4:09 pm
However, one might pause to reflect on the logical consistency of this proposition; as the editors of Gatley note at paragraph 13-013, a fact is by definition true (a ‘true fact’ being tautologous), and there cannot, therefore, be a factual basis for an opinion where the ‘fact’ indicated as the basis is false. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:36 am
"[13] All this before the Civil War began. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 7:47 am
Additionally, the investigation revealed the franchisee violated child labor rules by hiring children as young as 13-years-old and minors who worked later and longer than permitted by child labor laws at the employer’s three Oakland, Tracy and Newark locations. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 7:37 am
This law states the following: “Domestic violence” means any act that is a dangerous crime against children as defined in section 13-705 or an offense prescribed in section 13-1102, 13-1103, 13-1104, 13-1105, 13-1201, 13-1202, 13-1203, 13-1204, 13-1302, 13-1303, 13-1304, 13-1406, 13-1425, 13-1502, 13-1503, 13-1504,… [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 3:00 am
Where they are called on to decide eligibility to office, they are called on to enforce Section Three, applying the Constitution's legal standard to the facts before them in a given instance. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm
” Specifically, the proposed policy statement has the following five substantive sections: Section II (General Principles of OCC Review): Provides information about how the OCC considers the BMA statutory factors of financial stability, financial and managerial resources, and convenience and needs of the community and notes certain applicant and transaction features that, in the OCC’s experience, are consistent with an application approval. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 7:47 pm
(12/13/21). [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 7:45 pm
Friday, January 14, General Advertiser (Philadelphia), Jan. 25, 1791, at 3; see also Tench Coxe, An Examination of the Constitution for the United States of America 13 (Philadelphia, Zachariah Poulson 1788). [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm
Off-Ramp Argument No. 1: The Griffin’s Case Argument That Enforcement Requires Congressional Legislation “Congress, and only Congress,” writes the CRSCC (Brief at pp.13-14), “has authority to enforce Section 3,” and therefore “states cannot claim for themselves authority to seek the disqualification of presidential candidates absent congressional authorization. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 7:20 am
" For examples, Lash suggests (at 6) that the office of President of the United States might not be included in Section Three because "no scholar has identified a single example of a ratifier describing Section Three as including the office of the President," making similar inferences-from-silence about coverage of the Presidency throughout the piece (at 21, 31, 41). [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 5:22 am
As the key source for the geographic nexus requirement, the Manual relies on an Office of Legal Counsel Opinion by Assistant Attorney General Jack Goldsmith from 2004 (hereinafter – The OLC Opinion). [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 5:00 am
., the plaintiff employee, “SL”, had been the Health, Safety and Training Manager for the defendant (“Pantene”), for more than 13 years when Patene terminated her employment for cause on December 18, 2019. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 5:00 am
., the plaintiff employee, “SL”, had been the Health, Safety and Training Manager for the defendant (“Pantene”), for more than 13 years when Patene terminated her employment for cause on December 18, 2019. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 4:54 am
(That is, unlike the real Section Three, it applied to all confederates and not just former office-holders, it applied to voting in federal elections instead of office-holding, and it had a sunset clause.) [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 10:33 am
FordhamFordham Law’s Voting Rights & Democracy Project will host Ambassador Norm Eisen (ret.) to debrief the oral arguments before SCOTUS on whether Section Three of the Fourteenth Amendment disqualifies Former President Trump from running for office. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 6:29 pm
Ohio apply to the Section 3 question, and that such incitement was a form of “engaging in” the violent insurrection itself—conduct that disqualifies Trump from serving in any future covered federal or state office, including the presidency. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 4:40 pm
Section 40 provides incentives for the press to join a Leveson-standard regulator. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 1:01 pm
(We flagged these problems to the Court in paragraph 13 of our now-denied motion for leave to participate in oral arguments.) [read post]
