Search for: "SELLERS v. STATE" Results 181 - 200 of 3,978
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jun 2023, 7:09 pm by Jacob Fishman
Part V concludes with a report card on how the regime is doing on its thirtieth anniversary. [read post]
  Sales and Use Tax L. 2023 HB171 (Act 15) – Thresholds Modified for Remote Sellers and Marketplace Facilitators Previously, the Louisiana threshold for a remote seller or marketplace facilitator to register, report and remit use tax (both state and local) was gross revenue for sales delivered into Louisiana in excess of $100,000, or more than 200 transactions. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Indeed, as the plaintiffs themselves noted, the novel upon which 13 Reasons Why was based "was a hit, making the New York Times' young-adult best-seller list a few times. [read post]
Less than a week before Florida amended the FTSA, a plaintiff filed the first lawsuit under Oklahoma’s Telephone Solicitation Act (OTSA), Streater v. [read post]
11 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm by Guest Contributor
The Arkansas Supreme Court explained the effect of fraudulent inducement in Wal-Mart Stores v. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 10:30 pm by Sherica Celine
Wayfair State Law Survey Review this survey chart which reflects those states that have enacted legislation addressing the issue of collection and remittance responsibilities of remote sellers. [read post]
2 Jun 2023, 9:11 am by Barry Barnett
” https://www.linkedin.com/posts/barry-barnett-8313014_findings-and-conclusions-in-us-v-american-activity-7066821377835626497-6QFM? [read post]
1 Jun 2023, 6:41 pm by Mavrick Law Firm
  The United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida in Zendejas v. [read post]
26 May 2023, 6:15 am by Edgar Chen
The law also specifically bars any Chinese foreign principals from purchasing any real estate whatsoever in the state, with limited exceptions for residential property by those lawfully present in the United States. [read post]
24 May 2023, 1:33 am by Shrivar Chendip
The court stated that it was instead the seller who repudiated the sale agreement when she unequivocally expressed her intention to resile from the contract. [read post]