Search for: "STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. E. P" Results 181 - 200 of 284
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 May 2011, 6:51 am by Tomassi Law Associates
Filings have risen 6 percent in Utah and 2 percent in New Jersey. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:18 pm by Bexis
  Each case involves the reweighing of risks and benefits in light of “new information” or a “new . . . safer design. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 6:02 am by Bexis
Cutter Dodge, Inc., 47 P.3d 1222, 1232 (Haw. 2002), the Hawaii Supreme Court stated:[Plaintiffs] may not recover damages for emotional distress. [read post]
6 Mar 2011, 7:00 pm by cdw
The Alert has been focusing on rapid changes to the practice of indigent defense including issues of Public Defender independence in New Jersey and New Mexico, the scope of counsel in Michigan and Florida, as well as cost issues nationally and how one state, Massachusetts, has responded. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 7:07 am by Mandelman
Agard, Debtor, Chapter 7 The Court: United States Bankruptcy Court, Eastern District of New York The Judge: The Honorable Robert E. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:04 pm by axd10
Killing capital punishment in New Jersey the first state in modern history to repeal its death penalty statute. 41 Univ Toledo Law Rev 485 (2010). [read post]
23 Dec 2010, 8:17 am by smlangston
Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, West Building Ground Floor, Washington, DC 20590-0001. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 12:42 pm
App. 2002), where a New Jersey appellate court did extend a rule prohibiting the use of marketability discounts in shareholder dispute cases to divorce proceedings—effectively adopting “fair value” for appraisal rights as the appropriate valuation standard for New Jersey divorces. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 6:39 pm by Eric S. Solotoff
In fact, in New Jersey, the definition of income from support purposes includes all sources of income. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 1:22 pm by Bexis
Corp., 277 F.3d 415 (3d Cir. 2002), the Third Circuit twice refused to recognize public nuisance in product liability actions, first under New Jersey and then under Pennsylvania law. [read post]