Search for: "STATE v BURK"
Results 181 - 200
of 1,105
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 May 2018, 2:54 pm
From TS Media, Inc. v. [read post]
23 May 2018, 7:17 am
Facts: This case (Botelho v. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 6:00 am
On March 23, the USS Mustin, an Arleigh Burke-class guided missile destroyer, sailed within 12 nautical miles of Mischief Reef. [read post]
6 Apr 2018, 4:43 am
These allegations state a cause of action for legal malpractice (see Brooks v Lewin, 21 AD3d 731, 734 [1st Dept 2005], lv denied 6 NY3d 713 [2006]). [read post]
2 Apr 2018, 7:30 am
Gibbons v. [read post]
14 Mar 2018, 9:25 am
The case of Meritor Savings Bank v. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 3:17 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 3:17 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 7:20 am
Burke v. [read post]
11 Feb 2018, 4:57 pm
Trinidad and Tobago In the case of A Family v Burke, a High Court Judge found that the defendant was liable for the publication of false defamatory statements about the plaintiff family on Facebook. [read post]
26 Jan 2018, 10:15 am
She argued U.S. v. [read post]
26 Jan 2018, 10:15 am
She argued U.S. v. [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 10:20 am
United States v. [read post]
28 Dec 2017, 5:25 am
Burke PC v Aezah 2017 NY Slip Op 32670(U) December 14, 2017 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 654778/2016 Judge: David B. [read post]
19 Dec 2017, 12:18 pm
See Burks v. [read post]
17 Dec 2017, 3:28 pm
Madden v Midland Funding, LLC, 786 F.3d 246 (2d Cir. 2015), cert. denied, 136, S. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 9:57 am
The original lender could avoid those state-imposed limits thanks to federal preemption of state usury laws by the NBA. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 9:57 am
Angel Rzeslawsk,The National Bank Act and the Demise of State Consumer Laws, 68 Hastings L.J. 1421 (2017).CASE CITE: Madden v. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 12:01 pm
McIntosh, Civil Division, Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for amicus United States. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 4:20 am
A claim of professional malpractice requires proof that there was a departure from the accepted standards of practice and that the departure was a proximate cause of the injury (see Bruno v Trus Joist a Weyerhaeuser Bus., 87 AD3d 670, 672; Kung v Zheng, 73 AD3d 862, 863; Estate of Burke v Repetti & Co., 255 AD2d 483). [read post]