Search for: "STATE v COUNTS"
Results 181 - 200
of 17,151
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Apr 2024, 7:16 am
Nearly a decade ago, in Yates v. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 7:03 am
Other states have similar, recent decisions [see Western Millwork v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm
ENDNOTES [1] State v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
For example, in the 2014 case of Hobby Lobby v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 2:43 pm
The appeal court summarized the father’s criminal charges which included ten alleged offences between March 2020 and January 2023, leading to three counts of assault, one count of uttering threats, one count of criminal harassment, one count of mischief, and four counts of breaching his bail conditions. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 1:25 pm
The lawsuit (State of Texas v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 1:07 pm
The difference between the two definitions was addressed in the recent case of State v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am
In December 1996, Judge Jones issued his decision that excluded the plaintiffs’ expert witnesses’ proposed testimony on grounds that it failed to satisfy the requirements of Rule 702.[5] In October 1996, while Judge Jones was studying the record, and writing his opinion in the Hall case, Judge Weinstein, with a judge from the Southern District of New York, and another from New York state trial court, conducted a two-week Rule 702 hearing, in Brooklyn. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 8:42 am
Marshall filed a petition for post-conviction relief in which he argued that his trial counsel performed deficiently by […] The post STATE OF MARYLAND v. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm
For many business economists and legal academics, the purpose of any business organization is simply stated: to maximize profits. [read post]
5 Apr 2024, 1:00 am
The African Court on Human and Peoples’ RightsNoudehouenou v. [read post]
4 Apr 2024, 8:42 am
See United States v. [read post]
4 Apr 2024, 7:49 am
The case, New York v. [read post]
4 Apr 2024, 7:38 am
Basbanes v. [read post]
4 Apr 2024, 7:03 am
State v. [read post]
4 Apr 2024, 5:01 am
The Court's last word on the subject—its 2012 plurality opinion in Alvarez v. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 10:30 pm
Generating a means or a count does not necessarily imply that data subjects are no longer identifiable. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 2:52 pm
Hanrahan v. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 2:45 pm
The case, Lindke v. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 12:36 pm
Declaring the NLRB’s rationale to be “nonsense,” on March 26, 2024, a unanimous three-judge panel for the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia in Stern Produce Company Inc v. [read post]